ai_tool_treatment
Lund University's Swedish generative AI policy encourages staff and students to explore and use generative AI responsibly and creatively within the stated policy principles.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Lund University
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Lund University currently has 10 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 13, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
Claim changes
10 claim records
teaching
Lund University's Swedish policy says generative AI use is to support learning and research and does not replace basic skills, critical thinking, or scientific method.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
Lund University's Swedish policy says staff and students are responsible for all content they produce, including when generative AI has been used as support.
Review: Agent reviewed
procurement
Lund University's Swedish policy says generative AI use is to comply with privacy and security laws and that procured tools or existing licensing agreements should be used in the first instance.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
Lund University's student guidance says students who want to use GenAI for a compulsory assignment or examination must check whether it is permitted and how to report its use; presenting GenAI-generated work as one's own may be treated as cheating.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
Lund University's staff AI page says users may not write or upload sensitive material or sensitive personal data to ChatGPT, and may never upload medical information regardless of confidentiality status.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Lund University's GenAI Q&A says generative AI tools are permissible in education when teachers believe they contribute to or facilitate learning, with teachers responsible for informing students about course or programme rules.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Lund University's teacher guidance says teachers should inform students after deciding how GenAI products may be used in teaching and should explain whether and how students can use GenAI products in their work.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
Lund University's student guidance says students should primarily use Lund-licensed tools such as Microsoft Copilot Chat and Google Gemini, and must not upload other students' work, sensitive personal data, or copyright-protected material.
Review: Agent reviewed
procurement
Lund University's staff AI page says ChatGPT is available free of charge to teachers and researchers for one year through ChatGPT Edu.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
5 source attributions
AI at Lund University
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 2:34 AM
Guidance for teachers in five steps
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 2:34 AM
How to use generative AI responsibly
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 2:34 AM
Policy med principer för användning av generativ AI inom Lunds universitet
official_policy_page Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 2:34 AM
Questions and answers on GenAI tools
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 2:34 AM