Wijzigingslogboek

Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD)

Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldLaatst gecontroleerd27 jul 2026Laatst gewijzigd27 jul 2026Claims8Bronnen2Laatste releasepublic-release-20260727-015Releaseregistraties1

Universiteitspagina Openbaar JSON Maandrapport Universiteitsindex

Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD) currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 27 jul 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 7 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.

Deze pagina combineert alle openbare releasediffs voor Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD). Individuele releasesnapshots blijven beschikbaar via hun release-specifieke URL's.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Zojuist geëxtraheerde beweringen zijn toevoegingen aan de tracker en zijn niet per se recent door de universiteit gepubliceerd. Wijzigingen in bron-snapshots tonen hashwijzigingen voor dezelfde bron-URL en zijn op zichzelf geen beleidswijzigingen.

Beleidstekst0Zojuist geëxtraheerd7Bewijs0Bronsnapshots0Bron tekst0Bron toegevoegd1Bron verwijderd0

11 # Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD) AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: IIT Delhi's GenAI guidelines call for full disclosure of any work or content generated with the assistance of GenAI tools, including noting AI-created images, tables, data visualizations, or significant text sections.
5+Evidence (en, 35f4babab275): Any work or content generated with the assistance of GenAI tools be fully disclosed to ensure transparency and maintain academic integrity. Specifically, if GenAI tools are used to create distinct elements—such as images, tables, data visualizations, or significant sections of text—this use should be noted as such.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-27T05:20:00.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+academic_integrity: The guidelines state that authors remain fully responsible for verifying the accuracy of AI-assisted work, rigorously fact-checking it and proactively confirming it is free from plagiarism.
10+Evidence (en, 35f4babab275): Authors of content assume full responsibility for verifying the accuracy of their work. The content should be rigorously fact-checked to ensure it is correct and up-to-date. Proactive measures should be undertaken to confirm that the content is free from plagiarism.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-27T05:20:00.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+privacy: The guidelines direct all users to exercise caution when entering data into GenAI tools and to screen out sensitive or private details before use.
15+Evidence (en, 35f4babab275): All users exercise caution when inputting data or queries into GenAI tools, as these inputs could potentially become publicly accessible. Before utilizing such tools, users should thoroughly screen any information to identify and exclude sensitive or private details.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-27T05:20:00.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+teaching: IIT Delhi's committee holds that outright restriction of GenAI tools is neither enforceable nor desirable and recommends that each course instructor develop their own plagiarism policy governing AI use.
20+Evidence (en, 35f4babab275): Recognizing that outright restriction on the use of GenAI tools in academic tasks is neither enforceable nor desirable, it is recommended that each course instructor develop a plagiarism policy under the updated curriculum.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-27T05:20:00.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+academic_integrity: Course-level plagiarism policies are expected to set differentiated consequences for AI misuse while rewarding honest, responsible engagement with AI tools.
25+Evidence (en, 35f4babab275): Such a policy should establish differentiated consequences for misuse of AI, such as submitting AI-generated work without any personal input or understanding. At the same time, it should reward honest, responsible engagement with AI tools.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-27T05:20:00.000Z
1227 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1328 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
29+ai_tool_treatment: The committee recommends that IIT Delhi acquire institute-wide licenses for paid GenAI tools such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot to ensure equitable access.
30+Evidence (en, 35f4babab275): It is recommended that the institute acquire an institute-wide license for the advanced and more accurate versions of GenAI tools which are behind paywalls, such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot. This is to ensure equitable access to the tools across all departments and users.
31+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-27T05:20:00.000Z
1432 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1533 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
34+teaching: Academic Units are advised to reevaluate assessment methods, prioritizing approaches that AI tools cannot easily replicate.
35+Evidence (en, 35f4babab275): This may entail reevaluating current methods of assessment for assignments and examinations, prioritizing approaches that encourage critical thinking, original analysis, and application of knowledge in ways that AI tools cannot replicate easily.
36+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-27T05:20:00.000Z
1637 ## Source attribution added
1738 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
39+Source https://academics.iitd.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/IITD-AI-Guidelines.pdf snapshot 35f4babab275ed41471e7fa3c8cf5d9352ca010cdcd01ed511642ffe6d89e6ac
40+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-27T05:20:00.000Z

Geschiedenis releases

1 verschil openbare publicatie

public-release-20260727-015

Vergeleken met public-release-20260727-014.

Beleidstekst0Zojuist geëxtraheerd7Bronsnapshots0Bron tekst0

Verschil van release Diff JSON

11 # Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD) AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: IIT Delhi's GenAI guidelines call for full disclosure of any work or content generated with the assistance of GenAI tools, including noting AI-created images, tables, data visualizations, or significant text sections.
5+Evidence (en, 35f4babab275): Any work or content generated with the assistance of GenAI tools be fully disclosed to ensure transparency and maintain academic integrity. Specifically, if GenAI tools are used to create distinct elements—such as images, tables, data visualizations, or significant sections of text—this use should be noted as such.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-27T05:20:00.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+academic_integrity: The guidelines state that authors remain fully responsible for verifying the accuracy of AI-assisted work, rigorously fact-checking it and proactively confirming it is free from plagiarism.
10+Evidence (en, 35f4babab275): Authors of content assume full responsibility for verifying the accuracy of their work. The content should be rigorously fact-checked to ensure it is correct and up-to-date. Proactive measures should be undertaken to confirm that the content is free from plagiarism.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-27T05:20:00.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+privacy: The guidelines direct all users to exercise caution when entering data into GenAI tools and to screen out sensitive or private details before use.
15+Evidence (en, 35f4babab275): All users exercise caution when inputting data or queries into GenAI tools, as these inputs could potentially become publicly accessible. Before utilizing such tools, users should thoroughly screen any information to identify and exclude sensitive or private details.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-27T05:20:00.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+teaching: IIT Delhi's committee holds that outright restriction of GenAI tools is neither enforceable nor desirable and recommends that each course instructor develop their own plagiarism policy governing AI use.
20+Evidence (en, 35f4babab275): Recognizing that outright restriction on the use of GenAI tools in academic tasks is neither enforceable nor desirable, it is recommended that each course instructor develop a plagiarism policy under the updated curriculum.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-27T05:20:00.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+academic_integrity: Course-level plagiarism policies are expected to set differentiated consequences for AI misuse while rewarding honest, responsible engagement with AI tools.
25+Evidence (en, 35f4babab275): Such a policy should establish differentiated consequences for misuse of AI, such as submitting AI-generated work without any personal input or understanding. At the same time, it should reward honest, responsible engagement with AI tools.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-27T05:20:00.000Z
1227 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1328 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
29+ai_tool_treatment: The committee recommends that IIT Delhi acquire institute-wide licenses for paid GenAI tools such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot to ensure equitable access.
30+Evidence (en, 35f4babab275): It is recommended that the institute acquire an institute-wide license for the advanced and more accurate versions of GenAI tools which are behind paywalls, such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot. This is to ensure equitable access to the tools across all departments and users.
31+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-27T05:20:00.000Z
1432 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1533 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
34+teaching: Academic Units are advised to reevaluate assessment methods, prioritizing approaches that AI tools cannot easily replicate.
35+Evidence (en, 35f4babab275): This may entail reevaluating current methods of assessment for assignments and examinations, prioritizing approaches that encourage critical thinking, original analysis, and application of knowledge in ways that AI tools cannot replicate easily.
36+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-27T05:20:00.000Z
1637 ## Source attribution added
1738 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
39+Source https://academics.iitd.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/IITD-AI-Guidelines.pdf snapshot 35f4babab275ed41471e7fa3c8cf5d9352ca010cdcd01ed511642ffe6d89e6ac
40+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-27T05:20:00.000Z

Aanpassingen claimen

8 Claimen registers

ai_tool_treatment

IIT Delhi's GenAI guidelines call for full disclosure of any work or content generated with the assistance of GenAI tools, including noting AI-created images, tables, data visualizations, or significant text sections.