Dodano
The guidelines state that authors remain fully responsible for verifying the accuracy of AI-assisted work, rigorously fact-checking it and proactively confirming it is free from plagiarism.
Historia rejestru
Aktualizacje zweryfikowanych danych serwisu nie potwierdzają zmiany zasad uczelni.
Pasujące wersje: 1
Liczba objętych wpisów: 7 (Dodano: 7)
Wersja: public-release-20260727-015Liczba objętych wpisów: 7 (Dodano: 7)
Zasady używania narzędzi AI · Uczciwość akademicka · Pozostałe tematy: 2
The guidelines state that authors remain fully responsible for verifying the accuracy of AI-assisted work, rigorously fact-checking it and proactively confirming it is free from plagiarism.
Course-level plagiarism policies are expected to set differentiated consequences for AI misuse while rewarding honest, responsible engagement with AI tools.
IIT Delhi's committee holds that outright restriction of GenAI tools is neither enforceable nor desirable and recommends that each course instructor develop their own plagiarism policy governing AI use.
Academic Units are advised to reevaluate assessment methods, prioritizing approaches that AI tools cannot easily replicate.
The guidelines direct all users to exercise caution when entering data into GenAI tools and to screen out sensitive or private details before use.
IIT Delhi's GenAI guidelines call for full disclosure of any work or content generated with the assistance of GenAI tools, including noting AI-created images, tables, data visualizations, or significant text sections.
The committee recommends that IIT Delhi acquire institute-wide licenses for paid GenAI tools such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot to ensure equitable access.