academic_integrity
VMU guidance requires clear indication of what part of student work used GAI and for what purpose, and states that students are responsible for generated content they submit.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Vytautas Magnus University
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Vytautas Magnus University currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 18, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for Vytautas Magnus University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Vytautas Magnus University combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+10-0
11 # Vytautas Magnus University AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: VMU guidance requires clear indication of what part of student work used GAI and for what purpose, and states that students are responsible for generated content they submit.
3+Evidence (lt, b0edae750350): 7. Naudojant GDI studijų procese privaloma aiškiai nurodyti kuri dalis ir kokiu tikslu naudojama, laikytis akademinio sąžiningumo principų bei nurodyti šaltiniuose laikantis akademinių padalinių patvirtintų metodinių reikalavimų rašto darbams. 16. ... Už sugeneruotą turinį atsako studentas, pateikdamas atsiskaitymo medžiagą.
4+ai_tool_treatment: VMU Study Regulations allow artificial-intelligence tools in courses, written work, and independent assignments when use follows university provisions, unit procedures, course-description purposes, and academic-integrity rules.
5+Evidence (lt, ac91c542f457): 98. Studijų dalykų studijose, rengiant rašto darbus, atliekant savarankiško darbo užduotis, gali būti naudojami dirbtinio intelekto įrankiai vadovaujantis Universiteto nuostatomis, padalinio nustatyta tvarka ir studijų dalyko apraše numatytais tikslais, laikantis akademinio sąžiningumo principų, nustatytų Etikos kodekse ir Plagiato prevencijos nuostatuose.
6+teaching: VMU guidance says the extent and conditions for generative AI use may be set at course, study-program committee, or academic-unit level.
7+Evidence (lt, b0edae750350): 5. GDI gali būti naudojamas tokia apimtimi ir tokiomis sąlygomis, kurios dėstytojo nustatomos studijų dalyko lygmenyje ar studijų programų komiteto (SPK) – studijų programos lygmenyje. Gali būti akademinio padalinio lygmens sprendimai visoms to padalinio vykdomoms studijoms.
8+security_review: VMU's Senate strategic position says AI tools should be validated in relevant units before being implemented and used in university activities to ensure safety and compatibility with EU and Lithuanian law.
9+Evidence (lt, 1ec293f3e6d3): 2. Prieš diegiant ir naudojant DI universiteto veiklose, atitinkamuose padaliniuose turėtų būti atliekamas DI įrankių validavimas, siekiant užtikrinti, kad naudojami įrankiai būtų saugūs ir derėtų su Europos Sąjungos ir Lietuvos Respublikos teisės aktais.
10+research: VMU guidance for scientific and artistic research says researchers and artists must use AI honestly, prudently, and responsibly, and should verify AI-generated results in reliable scientific sources.
11+Evidence (lt, 1ec293f3e6d3): 1. ... tyrėjai ir menininkai privalo naudoti DI įrankius sąžiningai, apdairiai ir atsakingai, kritiškai vertindami DI generuojamos informacijos patikimumą ir jos atitikimą etikos reikalavimams. 8. ... DI generuojamas užklausos rezultatas turi būti patikrintas patikimuose mokslinės informacijos šaltiniuose.
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
5 claim records
ai_tool_treatment
VMU Study Regulations allow artificial-intelligence tools in courses, written work, and independent assignments when use follows university provisions, unit procedures, course-description purposes, and academic-integrity rules.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
VMU guidance says the extent and conditions for generative AI use may be set at course, study-program committee, or academic-unit level.
Review: Agent reviewed
security_review
VMU's Senate strategic position says AI tools should be validated in relevant units before being implemented and used in university activities to ensure safety and compatibility with EU and Lithuanian law.
Review: Agent reviewed
research
VMU guidance for scientific and artistic research says researchers and artists must use AI honestly, prudently, and responsibly, and should verify AI-generated results in reliable scientific sources.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
3 source attributions
Vytauto Didziojo universiteto generatyvinio dirbtinio intelekto naudojimo studiju procese gaires ir rekomendacijos
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 18, 2026, 10:12 PM
Vytauto Didziojo universiteto Senato strategine pozicija del dirbtinio intelekto universiteto veiklose
official_policy_page Tracker checked at May 18, 2026, 10:12 PM
Vytauto Didziojo universiteto studiju reguliaminas
official_policy_page Tracker checked at May 18, 2026, 10:12 PM