University AI Policy Tracker

Rekod dasar AI universiti yang terbuka dan berasaskan bukti untuk kegunaan awam.

APIGitHub
Bahasa
ENZHFRPL

Change log

University of Surrey

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Claims4Sources3Release records0
University pagePublic JSONMonthly reportUniversity index

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Surrey currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for University of Surrey. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

University of Surrey combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+8-0
11 # University of Surrey AI policy record
2+privacy: University of Surrey's GenAI procedure says personal, confidential, and commercially sensitive information, including intellectual property, must not be entered into GenAI tools unless those tools are approved by IT Services and meet security and compliance requirements.
3+Evidence (en, d70c5e63007d): To reduce the risk of data breaches and misuse, personal, confidential, and commercially sensitive information (including Intellectual Property) must NOT be entered into GenAI tools--internal or external--unless they are approved by IT Services and meet the organisation's security and compliance requirements.
4+ai_tool_treatment: University of Surrey's GenAI procedure says all users must read and understand the procedure before using any form of GenAI during University work, and frames GenAI use as supporting teaching, research, and operations while protecting information and integrity.
5+Evidence (en, d70c5e63007d): This procedure sets out how GenAI tools may be used within the University to support teaching, research, and operations, while protecting information, complying with legal and regulatory requirements, and maintaining academic and professional integrity. All users must read and understand this procedure before engaging with any form of GenAI during University work.
6+research: University of Surrey's CAQDAS guidance for qualitative data analysis says researchers intending to use Generative AI for any aspect of qualitative data analysis must be upfront with participants and seek their consent for using their data in that way.
7+Evidence (en-GB, f40698d95efd): If you intend to use Generative AI for any aspect of qualitative data analysis, you must be upfront about it with participants and seek their consent for you using their data in this way.
8+academic_integrity: University of Surrey's MySurrey Help page advises students considering generative AI tools in their work to read the student GenAI guidance and to check assessment briefs or module leaders for the level of AI use permitted in a specific assessment.
9+Evidence (en, 9f8a51ad6979): If you are thinking of using generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools, such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, etc., in your work, the University has produced guidelines for students on responsible use of generative AI (Gen AI). It is important to read and familiarise yourself with these guidelines. In addition, always check your Assessment Briefs or consult your Module Leaders about the levels of AI use permitted for any specific assessment.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

4 claim records

privacy

University of Surrey's GenAI procedure says personal, confidential, and commercially sensitive information, including intellectual property, must not be entered into GenAI tools unless those tools are approved by IT Services and meet security and compliance requirements.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

University of Surrey's GenAI procedure says all users must read and understand the procedure before using any form of GenAI during University work, and frames GenAI use as supporting teaching, research, and operations while protecting information and integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

research

University of Surrey's CAQDAS guidance for qualitative data analysis says researchers intending to use Generative AI for any aspect of qualitative data analysis must be upfront with participants and seek their consent for using their data in that way.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

academic_integrity

University of Surrey's MySurrey Help page advises students considering generative AI tools in their work to read the student GenAI guidance and to check assessment briefs or module leaders for the level of AI use permitted in a specific assessment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

3 source attributions