Change log

University of Jyväskylä

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Jyväskylä currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 17, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for University of Jyväskylä. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

University of Jyväskylä combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+12-0
11 # University of Jyväskylä AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: JYU's student guideline states that artificial intelligence is not a scientific source and is not suitable as a scientific source, for example in theses.
3+Evidence (en, c35bf67d7290): Artificial intelligence is not a scientific source. Artificial intelligence can support studying as according to point 1, but it is not suitable to be used as a scientific source, for example, in theses.
4+academic_integrity: JYU instructs students that if generative AI applications are used in assignments or theses, the work must mention which application was used and how it was used.
5+Evidence (en, c35bf67d7290): If generative artificial intelligence applications have been used in completing assignments or theses related to studies, the work must mention which application was used and how it was used.
6+source_status: The University of Jyväskylä has a public general student guideline page for AI-based applications in studies approved by its Education Council on 25 May 2023.
7+Evidence (en, c35bf67d7290): On 25 May 2023, the Education Council of the University of Jyväskylä approved these guidelines as the University's general guidelines for the use of artificial intelligence (AI) applications.
8+ai_tool_treatment: JYU's student guideline says using AI-based applications to assist in studies is in principle permissible, but the teacher responsible for the study unit gives the final instructions.
9+Evidence (en, c35bf67d7290): Using AI-based applications to assist in studies is in principle permissible. The teacher in charge of the study unit's implementation gives final instructions on the use of the AI applications.
10+academic_integrity: JYU's reporting page tells students to follow course-specific reporting guidelines when present and otherwise report the AI tool, version/date, purpose, verification, and their own contribution.
11+Evidence (en, 3cbe206d3e84): If your teacher has not prohibited the use of AI in the assignment, please report the use of AI according to the following instructions. If the course has its own reporting guidelines, please follow them.
12+source_status: JYU's AI in information seeking page says students and researchers affiliated with the university need to use AI tools according to JYU guidelines and policies, while staff and researcher policy links were login-gated during this crawl.
13+Evidence (en, 28e3e06d50c9): Students and researchers affiliated with the university need to utilise AI tools according to the guidelines and policies of the University of Jyväskylä.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

6 claim records

source_status

JYU's AI in information seeking page says students and researchers affiliated with the university need to use AI tools according to JYU guidelines and policies, while staff and researcher policy links were login-gated during this crawl.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

JYU's reporting page tells students to follow course-specific reporting guidelines when present and otherwise report the AI tool, version/date, purpose, verification, and their own contribution.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

JYU instructs students that if generative AI applications are used in assignments or theses, the work must mention which application was used and how it was used.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

JYU's student guideline states that artificial intelligence is not a scientific source and is not suitable as a scientific source, for example in theses.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

JYU's student guideline says using AI-based applications to assist in studies is in principle permissible, but the teacher responsible for the study unit gives the final instructions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

source_status

The University of Jyväskylä has a public general student guideline page for AI-based applications in studies approved by its Education Council on 25 May 2023.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

4 source attributions