University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

API docsGitHub repo

Change log

University of Jyväskylä

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Claims6Sources4
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Jyväskylä currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 17, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

University of Jyväskylä current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+12-0
11 # University of Jyväskylä AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: JYU's student guideline states that artificial intelligence is not a scientific source and is not suitable as a scientific source, for example in theses.
3+Evidence (en, c35bf67d7290): Artificial intelligence is not a scientific source. Artificial intelligence can support studying as according to point 1, but it is not suitable to be used as a scientific source, for example, in theses.
4+academic_integrity: JYU instructs students that if generative AI applications are used in assignments or theses, the work must mention which application was used and how it was used.
5+Evidence (en, c35bf67d7290): If generative artificial intelligence applications have been used in completing assignments or theses related to studies, the work must mention which application was used and how it was used.
6+source_status: The University of Jyväskylä has a public general student guideline page for AI-based applications in studies approved by its Education Council on 25 May 2023.
7+Evidence (en, c35bf67d7290): On 25 May 2023, the Education Council of the University of Jyväskylä approved these guidelines as the University's general guidelines for the use of artificial intelligence (AI) applications.
8+ai_tool_treatment: JYU's student guideline says using AI-based applications to assist in studies is in principle permissible, but the teacher responsible for the study unit gives the final instructions.
9+Evidence (en, c35bf67d7290): Using AI-based applications to assist in studies is in principle permissible. The teacher in charge of the study unit's implementation gives final instructions on the use of the AI applications.
10+academic_integrity: JYU's reporting page tells students to follow course-specific reporting guidelines when present and otherwise report the AI tool, version/date, purpose, verification, and their own contribution.
11+Evidence (en, 3cbe206d3e84): If your teacher has not prohibited the use of AI in the assignment, please report the use of AI according to the following instructions. If the course has its own reporting guidelines, please follow them.
12+source_status: JYU's AI in information seeking page says students and researchers affiliated with the university need to use AI tools according to JYU guidelines and policies, while staff and researcher policy links were login-gated during this crawl.
13+Evidence (en, 28e3e06d50c9): Students and researchers affiliated with the university need to utilise AI tools according to the guidelines and policies of the University of Jyväskylä.

Claim changes

6 claim records

source_status

JYU's AI in information seeking page says students and researchers affiliated with the university need to use AI tools according to JYU guidelines and policies, while staff and researcher policy links were login-gated during this crawl.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

JYU's reporting page tells students to follow course-specific reporting guidelines when present and otherwise report the AI tool, version/date, purpose, verification, and their own contribution.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

JYU instructs students that if generative AI applications are used in assignments or theses, the work must mention which application was used and how it was used.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

JYU's student guideline states that artificial intelligence is not a scientific source and is not suitable as a scientific source, for example in theses.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

JYU's student guideline says using AI-based applications to assist in studies is in principle permissible, but the teacher responsible for the study unit gives the final instructions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

source_status

The University of Jyväskylä has a public general student guideline page for AI-based applications in studies approved by its Education Council on 25 May 2023.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

4 source attributions