Policy presence
University of Jyväskylä has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Jyväskylä, Finland
University of Jyväskylä
University of Jyväskylä is listed as QS 2026 rank 498. University of Jyväskylä has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
University of Jyväskylä is listed as QS 2026 rank 498. University of Jyväskylä has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Jyväskylä as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 17, 2026 and last changed on May 17, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-jyvaskyla.json. The entity-level confidence is 96%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Source status claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
University of Jyväskylä has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
University of Jyväskylä has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Academic integrity
University of Jyväskylä has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
University of Jyväskylä has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Named AI services
University of Jyväskylä has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
University of Jyväskylä has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
JYU's student guideline states that artificial intelligence is not a scientific source and is not suitable as a scientific source, for example in theses.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_not_scientific_source
Original evidence
Evidence 1Artificial intelligence is not a scientific source. Artificial intelligence can support studying as according to point 1, but it is not suitable to be used as a scientific source, for example, in theses.
Academic Integrity
JYU instructs students that if generative AI applications are used in assignments or theses, the work must mention which application was used and how it was used.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_use_must_be_reported
Original evidence
Evidence 1If generative artificial intelligence applications have been used in completing assignments or theses related to studies, the work must mention which application was used and how it was used.
Source Status
The University of Jyväskylä has a public general student guideline page for AI-based applications in studies approved by its Education Council on 25 May 2023.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: public_general_student_ai_guideline_found
Original evidence
Evidence 1On 25 May 2023, the Education Council of the University of Jyväskylä approved these guidelines as the University's general guidelines for the use of artificial intelligence (AI) applications.
Ai Tool Treatment
JYU's student guideline says using AI-based applications to assist in studies is in principle permissible, but the teacher responsible for the study unit gives the final instructions.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: permissible_with_teacher_final_instructions
Original evidence
Evidence 1Using AI-based applications to assist in studies is in principle permissible. The teacher in charge of the study unit's implementation gives final instructions on the use of the AI applications.
Academic Integrity
JYU's reporting page tells students to follow course-specific reporting guidelines when present and otherwise report the AI tool, version/date, purpose, verification, and their own contribution.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_reporting_template_available
Original evidence
Evidence 1If your teacher has not prohibited the use of AI in the assignment, please report the use of AI according to the following instructions. If the course has its own reporting guidelines, please follow them.
Source Status
JYU's AI in information seeking page says students and researchers affiliated with the university need to use AI tools according to JYU guidelines and policies, while staff and researcher policy links were login-gated during this crawl.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: public_page_references_guidelines_staff_researcher_links_login_gated
Original evidence
Evidence 1Students and researchers affiliated with the university need to utilise AI tools according to the guidelines and policies of the University of Jyväskylä.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
4 source attribution
AI in information seeking
jyu.fi
AI in studies
jyu.fi
Reporting the Use of Generative AI Tools in Learning Tasks
jyu.fi
Using AI-based applications in studies - JYU's instructions and guidelines
jyu.fi
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.