Policy presence
University of Jyväskylä has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Jyväskylä, Finland
University of Jyväskylä
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
University of Jyväskylä has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
University of Jyväskylä has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Academic integrity
University of Jyväskylä has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
University of Jyväskylä has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Named AI services
University of Jyväskylä has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
University of Jyväskylä has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
JYU's student guideline states that artificial intelligence is not a scientific source and is not suitable as a scientific source, for example in theses.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_not_scientific_source
Original evidence
Evidence 1Artificial intelligence is not a scientific source. Artificial intelligence can support studying as according to point 1, but it is not suitable to be used as a scientific source, for example, in theses.
Academic Integrity
JYU instructs students that if generative AI applications are used in assignments or theses, the work must mention which application was used and how it was used.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_use_must_be_reported
Original evidence
Evidence 1If generative artificial intelligence applications have been used in completing assignments or theses related to studies, the work must mention which application was used and how it was used.
Source Status
The University of Jyväskylä has a public general student guideline page for AI-based applications in studies approved by its Education Council on 25 May 2023.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: public_general_student_ai_guideline_found
Original evidence
Evidence 1On 25 May 2023, the Education Council of the University of Jyväskylä approved these guidelines as the University's general guidelines for the use of artificial intelligence (AI) applications.
Ai Tool Treatment
JYU's student guideline says using AI-based applications to assist in studies is in principle permissible, but the teacher responsible for the study unit gives the final instructions.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: permissible_with_teacher_final_instructions
Original evidence
Evidence 1Using AI-based applications to assist in studies is in principle permissible. The teacher in charge of the study unit's implementation gives final instructions on the use of the AI applications.
Academic Integrity
JYU's reporting page tells students to follow course-specific reporting guidelines when present and otherwise report the AI tool, version/date, purpose, verification, and their own contribution.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_reporting_template_available
Original evidence
Evidence 1If your teacher has not prohibited the use of AI in the assignment, please report the use of AI according to the following instructions. If the course has its own reporting guidelines, please follow them.
Source Status
JYU's AI in information seeking page says students and researchers affiliated with the university need to use AI tools according to JYU guidelines and policies, while staff and researcher policy links were login-gated during this crawl.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: public_page_references_guidelines_staff_researcher_links_login_gated
Original evidence
Evidence 1Students and researchers affiliated with the university need to utilise AI tools according to the guidelines and policies of the University of Jyväskylä.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
4 source attribution
AI in information seeking
jyu.fi
AI in studies
jyu.fi
Reporting the Use of Generative AI Tools in Learning Tasks
jyu.fi
Using AI-based applications in studies - JYU's instructions and guidelines
jyu.fi