Change log

University of Groningen

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Groningen currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for University of Groningen. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

University of Groningen combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+12-0
11 # University of Groningen AI policy record
2+privacy: University of Groningen's AI policy and regulations page tells UG users not to share personal or organizational details with AI systems, to keep human intervention for decisions about other people, and to follow GDPR and related laws.
3+Evidence (en, 1761735bdf89): Do not share any personal or organizational details while using AI systems. Do not let AI make decisions about other people without human intervention.
4+teaching: University of Groningen's teaching AI policy says AI tools may be used as aids, GenAI use beyond that must be mentioned, and faculties or courses may add extra rules.
5+Evidence (en, 55c87b9ad2ed): AI tools may be used as aids. When GenAI functionalities are used, this should always be mentioned/referred to. Additional rules may apply at the level of your faculty, degree programme, and course unit.
6+academic_integrity: UG guidance says unauthorized student AI use that hinders assessment can be fraud, and AI detection scores do not prove cheating.
7+Evidence (en, 1f37708bfbea): The unauthorized use of AI tools by students that hinders the assessment of a learning goal can be considered fraud and a breach of academic integrity. Cheating scores that are generated by AI detection tools may not be used to prove that a student has cheated.
8+ai_tool_treatment: UG presents Le Chat as a secure and reliable AI assistant and says the pilot is meant to help people use AI in a safe experimental environment.
9+Evidence (en, 82561a1b3493): Le Chat (Mistral AI) is a secure and reliable AI assistant for the UG that can help with daily tasks. The pilot offers the opportunity to familiarize yourself with AI within a safe and experimental environment.
10+privacy: UG says the Le Chat Enterprise licence is only active on @rug.nl accounts, other external AI tools may only process public information, and medium-confidentiality use requires disabling several tools.
11+Evidence (en, 25c3448f7c72): This licence is only active on the @rug.nl account. Other External AI tools may only be used for processing public information. Be cautious at medium confidentiality level: Mistral can be used, provided that code interpreter, image generation, web search, and Flash Answers are disabled.
12+research: UG says there are no specific AI guidelines for research, but the general AI guidelines still apply.
13+Evidence (en, 1761735bdf89): There are no specific guidelines for AI in research. Of course, the general guidelines do apply.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

6 claim records

privacy

University of Groningen's AI policy and regulations page tells UG users not to share personal or organizational details with AI systems, to keep human intervention for decisions about other people, and to follow GDPR and related laws.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

University of Groningen's teaching AI policy says AI tools may be used as aids, GenAI use beyond that must be mentioned, and faculties or courses may add extra rules.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

UG guidance says unauthorized student AI use that hinders assessment can be fraud, and AI detection scores do not prove cheating.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

UG presents Le Chat as a secure and reliable AI assistant and says the pilot is meant to help people use AI in a safe experimental environment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

UG says the Le Chat Enterprise licence is only active on @rug.nl accounts, other external AI tools may only process public information, and medium-confidentiality use requires disabling several tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

research

UG says there are no specific AI guidelines for research, but the general AI guidelines still apply.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

5 source attributions

Dealing with fraud and risks

official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 2:13 AM

Snapshot hash
1f37708bfbead522140d34e2ba167866aadc2c167d9aac272a75d3e10db7ec5c