Change log
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Current public record freshness and review state.
Universität Hamburg currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
8 claim records
The public UHHGPT page says UHHGPT uses an institutional access to OpenAI's ChatGPT API; prompts are sent to the ChatGPT API, login or other usage data are not transferred to ChatGPT or OpenAI, and prompts are not stored.
For teachers using generative AI to assess student work, the UHH orientation framework says the assessment must be performed by the examiner and not by generative AI; generative AI may only serve as an aid, and protected assessment work must not be entered if the data are used for training or otherwise.
The UHH orientation framework says generative AI use in teaching can be mandatory only when the AI systems are officially provided by UHH or when UHH provides licenses, such as UHHGPT.
The UHH orientation framework says personal data must not be used in generative AI, including UHHGPT, while German supervisory authorities are still examining the lawfulness of personal-data processing in the underlying ChatGPT model.
Where generative AI is permitted in an assessment, the UHH orientation framework says AI use must be transparent; AI text takeovers must be marked and documented, and AI tools used to process one's own text or data must be listed with the purpose of use.
For each examination, the UHH orientation framework says the relevant examiner or examination board must decide whether generative AI systems are permitted as aids, and unauthorized aids are governed by examination regulations and usually lead to a failing mark.
The UHH orientation framework says teachers and students should use generative AI reflectively and responsibly, check AI-generated content for correctness, and use generative AI only within legal, exam, data-protection, copyright, and good-scientific-practice requirements.
Universität Hamburg's central orientation framework, status 24 November 2025, sets a university-level framework for using generative AI in teaching and study and is directed at faculties, departments, and subjects for more specific recommendations.
2 source attributions
official_pdf Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 5:01 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 5:02 AM