Change log
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Current public record freshness and review state.
Technische Universität Berlin (TU Berlin) currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
8 claim records
TU Berlin's living AI guidelines say personal data may be entered into generative AI tools only when the operator neither makes the data accessible to third parties nor uses it as training data; confidential information, sensitive research data, and internal documents are not permitted inputs.
TU Berlin examination guidance states a general documentation duty when AI is used for assignments: students should identify the tools, extent, purpose, marked AI content, prompts, and their own contribution.
TU Berlin's living AI guidelines say fully automated assessment of study or examination performance is not permissible; AI output may not be adopted one-to-one and digital tools such as AI may serve only as aids.
TU Berlin examination guidance tells students they remain fully responsible for all AI-generated content; errors or inaccuracies in AI output count as the student's errors, and AI may support work but may not take over the actual work.
For final and seminar papers, TU Berlin examination guidance says AI-supported passages must be marked, except spelling checks and stylistic improvements, and that use of AI tools must be discussed with the supervisor.
TU Berlin's living AI guidelines say that if AI results are adopted in scientific work, they must be checked for content, revised, and labeled; uses without relevance to learning or epistemic work, such as grammar, style, spelling, or translation, usually do not need to be declared.
TU Berlin's ChatGPT Edu pilot page describes scoped institutional access: the pilot began with Faculty VII, lists EU-server use, TUB-account/pseudo-ID login, and research/teaching/administration use, and says the licenses were extended with all faculties participating and 790 licenses total.
TU Berlin's data-protection blog recommends limiting personal data in ChatGPT, not sharing confidential information, avoiding personal data especially about third parties, and disabling chat history because otherwise communication is stored long term and may feed training data depending on settings.
6 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:08 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:08 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:08 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:08 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:08 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:08 PM