Change log

Palacký University Olomouc

Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Palacký University Olomouc currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 18, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.

No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.

Claim changes

4 claim records

academic_integrity

UP's recommendations state that generative AI use in professional texts and other creative work must be declared, and that staff and students may not claim authorship of texts or other creative outputs generated using AI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

UP's recommendations warn that personal data, sensitive information, and potential UP intellectual property entered into AI systems must be handled responsibly because such data is usually made available to a third party and control over it may be lost.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

UP's generative AI recommendations state that AI systems at Palacky University Olomouc must be used in compliance with UP ethical principles and as tools to improve knowledge, skills, teaching, research, management, administration, or editing rather than as a full replacement for creative activity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

UP's recommendations say that if an educator uses AI in any form of assessment of student activities, such as evaluating written work, the assessment should include the educator's own assessment and not be made solely by AI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

2 source attributions