Change log

Lehigh University

Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Lehigh University currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 18, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.

No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.

Claim changes

8 claim records

research

Lehigh's human-subjects research guidance says use of AI to analyze or process data must be disclosed to participants during consent.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence1Languagesen

source_status

Lehigh's AI guiding principles page states that the principles are shared guideposts and are not intended to function as policy statements or a mandate.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

Lehigh tells faculty, staff, students, and affiliates that institutional, restricted, or critical data may not be submitted to online systems including generative AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

Lehigh says community members who learn of a potential data protection or confidentiality breach through generative AI tools or otherwise are required to report it to the Office of Information Security.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Lehigh says students are expected to follow instructor-set course rules and university academic integrity rules when using generative AI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

research

Lehigh says AI services acceptable for Class II data may be used in human-subjects research upon IRB approval, while unapproved services should be reviewed with LTS for data-security requirements.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Lehigh advises instructors to give students clear guidance on how generative AI tools may be used in coursework and research.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Lehigh's CITL guidance tells faculty to directly address generative AI and provide explicit guidance about whether and how students may use AI-powered tools in class.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

4 source attributions

Policies and Best Practices | Artificial Intelligence at Lehigh

official_guidance Tracker checked at May 18, 2026, 4:22 AM

Snapshot hash
f4c453d3b18d5ca437f7cb71d067a48a13a35e974cac9cf0e07f864111adfb14
Lehigh University AI Policy Tracker Release Diff | University AI Policy Tracker