research
Lehigh's human-subjects research guidance says use of AI to analyze or process data must be disclosed to participants during consent.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Lehigh University
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Lehigh University currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 18, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for Lehigh University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Lehigh University combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+16-0
11 # Lehigh University AI policy record
2+research: Lehigh's human-subjects research guidance says use of AI to analyze or process data must be disclosed to participants during consent.
3+Evidence (en, 2697ddf845a8): Use of AI to analyze or process data must be disclosed to participants as part of the consent process. The consent language must describe which AI tools will be used during or after the study, and whether AI tools will be used to process identifiable or de-identified data.
4+source_status: Lehigh's AI guiding principles page states that the principles are shared guideposts and are not intended to function as policy statements or a mandate.
5+Evidence (en, 734625c8ba8d): These principles are not intended to function as policy statements or a mandate. They are shared guideposts: a common starting point to support units, departments, and teams as they continue local, discipline-appropriate conversations about productive and responsible AI use.
6+privacy: Lehigh tells faculty, staff, students, and affiliates that institutional, restricted, or critical data may not be submitted to online systems including generative AI tools.
7+Evidence (en, f4c453d3b18d): For this reason you may not submit institutional data, restricted data, or critical data-this restriction is covered by Lehigh's Acceptable Use of Computing Systems Policy.
8+security_review: Lehigh says community members who learn of a potential data protection or confidentiality breach through generative AI tools or otherwise are required to report it to the Office of Information Security.
9+Evidence (en, f4c453d3b18d): Any member of the Lehigh community who learns of a potential breach of data protection or confidentiality- through the use of Generative AI tools or otherwise -is required by Section 5 of Lehigh's Acceptable Use Policy to report the incident to the Office of Information Security at security@lehigh.edu.
10+academic_integrity: Lehigh says students are expected to follow instructor-set course rules and university academic integrity rules when using generative AI.
11+Evidence (en, f4c453d3b18d): Students are expected to follow course-specific rules set by their instructors as well as academic integrity rules set by the university, as captured in the Student Code of Conduct.
12+research: Lehigh says AI services acceptable for Class II data may be used in human-subjects research upon IRB approval, while unapproved services should be reviewed with LTS for data-security requirements.
13+Evidence (en, 2697ddf845a8): Services that are acceptable for Class II data may be used in human subjects research upon approval from the IRB. In order to avoid security breaches, you must access these AI services via your Lehigh account.
14+teaching: Lehigh advises instructors to give students clear guidance on how generative AI tools may be used in coursework and research.
15+Evidence (en, f4c453d3b18d): Instructors are advised to give students clear guidance on the use of Generative AI tools for coursework and research.
16+teaching: Lehigh's CITL guidance tells faculty to directly address generative AI and provide explicit guidance about whether and how students may use AI-powered tools in class.
17+Evidence (en, 17bf8c5e6365): Directly address generative AI in your classroom, in your syllabi, in each assignment prompt, and in course materials. Provide students with explicit guidance about whether and how they may use AI-powered tools in your class.
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
8 claim records
source_status
Lehigh's AI guiding principles page states that the principles are shared guideposts and are not intended to function as policy statements or a mandate.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
Lehigh tells faculty, staff, students, and affiliates that institutional, restricted, or critical data may not be submitted to online systems including generative AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
security_review
Lehigh says community members who learn of a potential data protection or confidentiality breach through generative AI tools or otherwise are required to report it to the Office of Information Security.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
Lehigh says students are expected to follow instructor-set course rules and university academic integrity rules when using generative AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
research
Lehigh says AI services acceptable for Class II data may be used in human-subjects research upon IRB approval, while unapproved services should be reviewed with LTS for data-security requirements.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Lehigh advises instructors to give students clear guidance on how generative AI tools may be used in coursework and research.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Lehigh's CITL guidance tells faculty to directly address generative AI and provide explicit guidance about whether and how students may use AI-powered tools in class.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
4 source attributions
CITL Guidance for Faculty on Generative AI in the Classroom | Library & Technology Services
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 18, 2026, 4:23 AM
Guidance: Generative AI and Human Subjects Research | Office of the Vice Provost for Research
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 18, 2026, 4:23 AM
Guiding Principles | Artificial Intelligence at Lehigh
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 18, 2026, 4:22 AM
Policies and Best Practices | Artificial Intelligence at Lehigh
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 18, 2026, 4:22 AM