teaching
Hiroshima University's policy says teaching staff should revise teaching methods, content, assignments, and evaluation criteria when needed and evaluate student performance appropriately in light of generative AI use.
Change log
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Current public record freshness and review state.
Hiroshima University currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
6 claim records
Hiroshima University's policy says teaching staff should revise teaching methods, content, assignments, and evaluation criteria when needed and evaluate student performance appropriately in light of generative AI use.
Where generative AI use is allowed, Hiroshima University's policy says students should be warned that AI use can lead to leakage of personal or confidential information and that generated outputs may be incorrect.
Where generative AI use is allowed, Hiroshima University's policy says students should be told that using AI output as-is may amount to copyright infringement or plagiarism, and that any use or quoted output should be made clear in reports and similar assignments.
Hiroshima University tells course and thesis supervisors to judge whether generative AI may be used in classes or assignments and explain that decision to students through syllabi, guidance, or similar channels.
Hiroshima University's basic policy frames student use of generative AI in coursework around students identifying problems and considering solutions themselves, while users understand AI's mechanisms, benefits, risks, and changing literacy requirements.
Hiroshima University has an official 23 May 2023 page setting out its policy on use of generative AI, including ChatGPT, in educational activities.
2 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 11:41 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 11:41 PM