Change log

University of Pretoria

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Pretoria currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for University of Pretoria. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

University of Pretoria combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+12-0
11 # University of Pretoria AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: University of Pretoria Library guidance states that submitting AI-generated content as one's own work without explicit lecturer permission and proper disclosure constitutes academic misconduct under UP's Academic Integrity Policy.
3+Evidence (en, aa9eaee56cdb): Submitting AI-generated content as your own work — whether in whole or in part, whether modified or unmodified — without explicit permission from your lecturer and proper disclosure, constitutes academic misconduct under UP's Academic Integrity Policy and may result in serious disciplinary consequences.
4+ai_tool_treatment: University of Pretoria Library guidance states that module-level AI rules in the assignment brief and module outline take precedence, and students should ask their lecturer when in doubt.
5+Evidence (en, aa9eaee56cdb): AI policies at UP are evolving. The guidance on this page reflects UP's current position on academic integrity and the use of generative AI tools. Always check your specific assignment brief and module outline for module-level AI rules — these take precedence. When in doubt, ask your lecturer before you submit.
6+academic_integrity: University of Pretoria Library guidance states that students must disclose any use of AI tools in academic work and provide enough information for readers to understand the role AI played.
7+Evidence (en, e1416ef31601): Regardless of the citation format, the fundamental principle remains constant: you must disclose any use of AI tools in your academic work and provide sufficient information for readers to understand the role AI played in your research and writing process.
8+academic_integrity: University of Pretoria Library guidance tells students to assume AI use is prohibited unless explicit permission exists and to seek documented authorization before using AI tools in academic work.
9+Evidence (en, 3fccd17e8566): Absence of explicit permission means prohibition. Never assume AI use is acceptable because it wasn't specifically forbidden. Always seek documented authorization before using any AI tools in academic work. Unauthorized use results in academic misconduct charges regardless of intent or assumptions.
10+teaching: A University of Pretoria student guide recommends treating generative AI as a supplementary learning aid rather than a replacement for thorough research and academic rigour.
11+Evidence (en, 3831df66fba5): Use as a supplementary tool: Treat generative AI as an aid to expand your knowledge, enhance your critical thinking, and assist with generating ideas rather than as a replacement for thorough research and academic rigour.
12+privacy: A University of Pretoria student guide states that personal or confidential data should not be included when using generative AI technologies in the classroom.
13+Evidence (en, 3831df66fba5): Ensuring Data Privacy and Confidentiality: When using generative AI technologies in the classroom, it is crucial to ensure that personal or confidential data is not included in the training data, as the AI could unintentionally reproduce or leak sensitive information.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

6 claim records

academic_integrity

University of Pretoria Library guidance states that submitting AI-generated content as one's own work without explicit lecturer permission and proper disclosure constitutes academic misconduct under UP's Academic Integrity Policy.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

University of Pretoria Library guidance states that module-level AI rules in the assignment brief and module outline take precedence, and students should ask their lecturer when in doubt.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

University of Pretoria Library guidance states that students must disclose any use of AI tools in academic work and provide enough information for readers to understand the role AI played.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

University of Pretoria Library guidance tells students to assume AI use is prohibited unless explicit permission exists and to seek documented authorization before using AI tools in academic work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

A University of Pretoria student guide recommends treating generative AI as a supplementary learning aid rather than a replacement for thorough research and academic rigour.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

A University of Pretoria student guide states that personal or confidential data should not be included when using generative AI technologies in the classroom.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

4 source attributions

Can I use AI? - Artificial Intelligence Guidelines - Subject Guides at University of Pretoria

official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 2:43 PM

Snapshot hash
3fccd17e8566c839833321f61343d639c5001575b9cd96765b401bdac827c06b

Citing AI - Artificial Intelligence Guidelines - Subject Guides at University of Pretoria

official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 2:43 PM

Snapshot hash
e1416ef31601d44966a40fe9e98ad121a2450010f2c7e542adafdff943666a35

Responsible Use of AI - Artificial Intelligence Guidelines - Subject Guides at University of Pretoria

official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 2:43 PM

Snapshot hash
aa9eaee56cdbbc955448f432f2b81271b0fc516cc76ee7f86de26de45ed047e7