University AI Policy Tracker

Dossiers ouverts et fondes sur des preuves sur les politiques IA universitaires.

APIGitHub
Langue
ENZHFRPL

Change log

University of Helsinki

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 14, 2026Last changedMay 14, 2026Claims5Sources5Release records0
University pagePublic JSONMonthly reportUniversity index

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Helsinki currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for University of Helsinki. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

University of Helsinki combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # University of Helsinki AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: University of Helsinki student guidance treats prohibited use of large language models, or failing to report their use as instructed, as cheating; the cheating and plagiarism guidance also lists presenting AI-generated text or solutions as one's own as plagiarism.
3+Evidence (en, 4f5db1fc3f21): If you use a large language model in a course, part of a course or examination where it is prohibited in advance, please note that this constitutes cheating.
4+research: University of Helsinki research guidance supports responsible and critical use of GenAI in research, but says researchers are responsible for outputs, should verify them, describe substantial GenAI use, and must not list GenAI as a co-author.
5+Evidence (en, dcbeabc3bd2c): Researchers are responsible for their own use of GenAI ... you must always verify the output of GenAI ... When substantially using GenAI in your research, indicate the name of the tool and the version used.
6+teaching: University of Helsinki guidance says large language models may generally be used in teaching and writing support, while course teachers can restrict or prohibit use on pedagogical grounds and AI cannot be used in maturity tests.
7+Evidence (en, ef7c3d7900b4): As a rule, large language models may be used in teaching and in support of writing. On pedagogical grounds, course teachers can restrict or prohibit the use of large language models on their courses. In maturity tests, the use of large language models is not permitted.
8+privacy: University of Helsinki IT guidance says Copilot may only be used for public or open data and not personal data, while CurreChat may process internal data but not confidential or secret data.
9+Evidence (en, 0f160808e4d7): Copilot with commercial data protection ... can only be used to process public or open data. Personal data must not be processed in Copilot. CurreChat ... can also be used to process internal data. CurreChat must not be used to process confidential or secret data.
10+ai_tool_treatment: University of Helsinki identifies Microsoft Copilot with commercial data protection and CurreChat as its general-purpose generative AI services and recommends primarily using University-supported AI services.
11+Evidence (en, 0f160808e4d7): The University of Helsinki has two general-purpose generative AI solutions: Microsoft Copilot with commercial data protection, available for all students and staff members over the age of 18, and CurreChat, which is restricted for use by the staff and for teaching purposes. We recommend primarily using AI services supported by the University, such as Copilot with commercial data protection and CurreChat.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

5 claim records

research

University of Helsinki research guidance supports responsible and critical use of GenAI in research, but says researchers are responsible for outputs, should verify them, describe substantial GenAI use, and must not list GenAI as a co-author.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

University of Helsinki IT guidance says Copilot may only be used for public or open data and not personal data, while CurreChat may process internal data but not confidential or secret data.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

University of Helsinki identifies Microsoft Copilot with commercial data protection and CurreChat as its general-purpose generative AI services and recommends primarily using University-supported AI services.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

University of Helsinki student guidance treats prohibited use of large language models, or failing to report their use as instructed, as cheating; the cheating and plagiarism guidance also lists presenting AI-generated text or solutions as one's own as plagiarism.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence2Languagesen

teaching

University of Helsinki guidance says large language models may generally be used in teaching and writing support, while course teachers can restrict or prohibit use on pedagogical grounds and AI cannot be used in maturity tests.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

5 source attributions