Ajout
UTSA's faculty guide warns that AI detection tools are imperfect and recommends using established university conduct processes and evidence-based evaluation rather than relying solely on AI-detection results.
Révision du registre
Mises à jour de nos données vérifiées ; elles ne confirment pas un changement de politique de l’université.
La date de publication du registre n’est pas la date d’entrée en vigueur de la politique.
Éléments concernés : 5 (5 ajoutés)
Règles d’utilisation des outils d’IA · Intégrité académique · 2 autres thèmes
UTSA's faculty guide warns that AI detection tools are imperfect and recommends using established university conduct processes and evidence-based evaluation rather than relying solely on AI-detection results.
UTSA Libraries' Artificial Intelligence guide says AI-generated information should be fact-checked and that AI used as a source or content generator needs to be cited in submitted work.
UTSA's faculty generative AI guide advises faculty to clearly state in the syllabus and course homepage whether and how AI use is allowed, while recognizing that faculty may choose different course approaches.
UTSA's faculty generative AI guide identifies Microsoft Copilot as the only UTSA-approved AI tool in that guide, citing commercial data protection, and separately cautions users to avoid sharing private data to any LLM.
UTSA Academic Affairs maintains an official Teaching, Learning and Artificial Intelligence page that links separate UT San Antonio-created AI resources for students and faculty.
Textes ancien et nouveau non comparables.
Textes ancien et nouveau non comparables.
Textes ancien et nouveau non comparables.
Textes ancien et nouveau non comparables.
Textes ancien et nouveau non comparables.