11 # RUDN University AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+teaching: A RUDN Digital Literacy course program for the Ecology and Natural Resource Management bachelor's program includes generative AI tools, responsible AI use, authorship and originality, academic honesty, and practice with large language models as course topics.
5+Evidence (ru, 963370043588): Генеративный ИИ: большие языковые модели (ChatGPT, GigaChat, YandexGPT и др.), генерация изображений, аудио и видео. Этические вопросы применения ИИ: предвзятость алгоритмов, галлюцинации моделей, авторство и оригинальность, академическая честность.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T14:42:55.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+research: The RUDN Journal of Informatization in Education editorial AI policy requires authors to disclose AI-tool use during manuscript preparation, including text generation, data work, translation or editing, literature-search or reference-list work, and creation or processing of media.
10+Evidence (en, ce5ef77fcbdb): Authors are required to clearly and thoroughly disclose the use of AI tools at all stages of manuscript preparation, including: text generation; data preparation or verification; translation, paraphrasing, or editing of text; literature search or compilation of reference lists; creation or processing of images, graphs, charts, audio, and video materials.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T14:43:00.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+research: The RUDN Journal of Informatization in Education editorial AI policy prohibits editors from using AI to make manuscript decisions; rejecting, accepting, or returning a manuscript for revision must rest with a human editor.
15+Evidence (en, ce5ef77fcbdb): AI may not make decisions about rejecting, accepting, or sending back a manuscript for revision. These decisions must always rest with a human editor.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T14:43:00.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+privacy: The RUDN Journal of Informatization in Education editorial AI policy says reviewers should not enter manuscript content into publicly available or cloud-based AI services without explicit editor permission and compliance with confidentiality rules.
20+Evidence (en, ce5ef77fcbdb): No manuscript content (text, data, figures, tables, requested supplementary materials) should be entered into publicly available or cloud-based AI services without explicit permission from the editors and compliance with confidentiality rules.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T14:43:00.000Z
1022 ## Source attribution added
1123 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
24+Source https://journals.rudn.ru/informatization-education/about/editorialPolicies snapshot ce5ef77fcbdbed6d151012f5b1210ad699e6100cd1fee1315cccc7c01e0f93e9
25+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T14:43:00.000Z
1226 ## Source attribution added
1327 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
28+Source https://www.rudn.ru/sveden/files/eiv/Progr_CIFROVAYA_GRAMOTNOSTY_05.03.06_UPR_2026(1).pdf snapshot 96337004358824d6a9dc1835b183403927259ad5f9ccb5350bc32de370fdc3e3
29+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T14:42:55.000Z