11 # Colorado School of Mines AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+academic_integrity: Mines sample syllabus language says students who include AI-generated ideas, text, code, or images in submitted work must document and credit the source, and that failure to properly cite AI tools would be considered academic misconduct.
5+Evidence (en, c37960e55089): If you include content (e.g., ideas, text, code, images) that was generated, in whole or in part, by Generative Artificial Intelligence tools (including, but not limited to, ChatGPT and other large language models) in work submitted for evaluation in this course, you must document and credit your source.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T23:51:00.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+ai_tool_treatment: In the absence of contrary written instructor directions, Mines guidance says students may not submit evaluation work generated in whole or in part by GenAI, while GenAI use for learning, studying, proofreading, and brainstorming is permitted and encouraged unless instructors state otherwise.
10+Evidence (en, c37960e55089): Unless instructors provide explicit permission or instruction to the contrary, students may not submit content for evaluation that was generated, in whole or in part, by genAI tools. Using genAI tools when unauthorized would be considered a potential violation of Mines' policy on academic integrity.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T23:51:00.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+source_status: Colorado School of Mines Academic Affairs maintains official generative-AI guidance, but the page frames the material as guidelines rather than a universal policy prescribing when GenAI must be allowed or disallowed.
15+Evidence (en, c37960e55089): While the intent of this resource is not to prescribe universal policies of when to allow or disallow generative AI, the text below provides some guidelines for the use of genAI in connection with academic work at the University.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T23:51:00.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+teaching: Mines guidance expects faculty to state course GenAI expectations explicitly and in writing, including permitted and prohibited uses, and encourages instructors to design assignments that reduce unethical GenAI use.
20+Evidence (en, c37960e55089): Faculty are expected to state explicitly and affirmatively their expectations regarding student use of genAI tools. Instructors should specify in writing the permitted and prohibited uses of genAI tools in their courses, and should seek to clarify any expectations if they differ from one assessment to another.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T23:51:00.000Z
1022 ## Source attribution added
1123 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
24+Source https://academicaffairs.mines.edu/genai/ snapshot c37960e550898580212258ad12fbc7ef9b6d86bdff919d4d7ca0459266147f66
25+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T23:51:00.000Z