Journal des modifications

Maastricht University

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Résumé des modifications

Actualité des dossiers publics et état d'examen actuel.

Maastricht University currently has 9 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 15 mai 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Cette page combine toutes les différences de publication publique pour Maastricht University. Les instantanés des versions individuelles restent disponibles via leurs URL spécifiques à la version.

Aucune ligne de différence de politique entre les versions n'est encore enregistrée pour cette université. La page suit toujours les affirmations actuelles étayées par des sources, les attributions de sources officielles, l'état d'examen, la fraîcheur des sources et les JSON publics pour la découverte et la citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Les affirmations récemment extraites sont des ajouts au suivi et ne sont pas nécessairement de nouvelles publications de l'université. Les changements d'instantané source montrent des variations de hachage pour la même URL source et ne constituent pas en eux-mêmes des changements de politique.

Catégories de différences

Classification sémantique pour cette différence de version.

Texte de la politique0Récemment extraits0Preuve0Instantanés source0Texte source0Source ajoutée0Source supprimée0

Différentiel de version combinée

Diffusion unifiée du suivi générée à partir de toutes les captures instantanées de version publique pour cette université.

différentiel Maastricht University combined release

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+18-0
11 # Maastricht University AI policy record
2+source_status: Maastricht University has officially adopted a Generative AI policy framework that provides guidelines for responsible use in education, research, and operations.
3+Evidence (en, 5fe4d0503eb4): Maastricht University has officially adopted a policy framework on Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI). This document clarifies UM’s position on GenAI and provides guidelines for its responsible use in education, research, and operations.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Maastricht University facilitates and encourages GenAI use where relevant in education, research, and operations rather than prohibiting the technology.
5+Evidence (en, a37c4cacf9ce): Rather than prohibiting the technology, we facilitate and encourage its use where relevant in education, research and operations.
6+other: Maastricht University states that GenAI is used at all times in compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
7+Evidence (en, a37c4cacf9ce): GenAI is used at all times in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Where specific laws and regulations are lacking, we act in the spirit of those that do exist.
8+teaching: For education, Maastricht University says permitted GenAI uses are clearly defined at activity, course/module, study programme, and faculty levels.
9+Evidence (en, a37c4cacf9ce): Permitted uses of GenAI are clearly defined at every relevant level: activity, course/module, study programme and faculty.
10+teaching: Maastricht University says AI systems for marking/evaluating assessments and selection/admission may be used only under certain mandatory conditions that must be investigated before use.
11+Evidence (en, a37c4cacf9ce): These AI systems may only be used under certain mandatory conditions. These conditions must be thoroughly investigated at UM before AI systems can be used to assess students or assist in selection and admission procedures.
12+research: For research, Maastricht University says researchers hold final accountability for ethical use of GenAI tools and must act in accordance with research integrity, personal-data, and UM policy rules.
13+Evidence (en, a37c4cacf9ce): Researchers hold final accountability for the ethical use of GenAI tools in their research and act in accordance with the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity, rules on the processing of personal data and all UM codes of conduct and policy.
14+research: For research output, Maastricht University says substantial GenAI use should be communicated transparently and referenced appropriately by researchers.
15+Evidence (en, a37c4cacf9ce): Researchers are transparent about substantial use of GenAI in their research. This includes clear communication about the use of GenAI with supervisors, collaboration partners and other relevant stakeholders. The use of GenAI should be referenced appropriately by researchers.
16+privacy: For operations, Maastricht University says GenAI tools are never used to process personal or organisation-sensitive data unless transparency and applicable safeguards are in place.
17+Evidence (en, a37c4cacf9ce): GenAI tools are never used to process personal or organisation-sensitive data in the absence of transparency about how these data are used and without safeguarding that all applicable conditions for the use of GenAI have been met.
18+academic_integrity: Maastricht University warns that using GenAI to generate content and present it as one’s own constitutes academic dishonesty.
19+Evidence (en, 2b37432bee63): Using GenAI to generate content and present it as one’s own constitutes academic dishonesty, akin to plagiarism or fraud.

Historique des versions

0 public release diffs

Modifications d'affirmations

9 Affirmation enregistrements

source_status

Maastricht University has officially adopted a Generative AI policy framework that provides guidelines for responsible use in education, research, and operations.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance88%Preuve1Languesen

ai_tool_treatment

Maastricht University facilitates and encourages GenAI use where relevant in education, research, and operations rather than prohibiting the technology.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance88%Preuve1Languesen

other

Maastricht University states that GenAI is used at all times in compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance88%Preuve1Languesen

teaching

For education, Maastricht University says permitted GenAI uses are clearly defined at activity, course/module, study programme, and faculty levels.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance88%Preuve1Languesen

teaching

Maastricht University says AI systems for marking/evaluating assessments and selection/admission may be used only under certain mandatory conditions that must be investigated before use.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance88%Preuve1Languesen

research

For research, Maastricht University says researchers hold final accountability for ethical use of GenAI tools and must act in accordance with research integrity, personal-data, and UM policy rules.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance88%Preuve1Languesen

research

For research output, Maastricht University says substantial GenAI use should be communicated transparently and referenced appropriately by researchers.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance88%Preuve1Languesen

privacy

For operations, Maastricht University says GenAI tools are never used to process personal or organisation-sensitive data unless transparency and applicable safeguards are in place.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance88%Preuve1Languesen

academic_integrity

Maastricht University warns that using GenAI to generate content and present it as one’s own constitutes academic dishonesty.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance88%Preuve1Languesen

Instantanés source

5 source attributions