Lisätty
UMKC does not recommend using AI detection tools as the single piece of evidence to support an academic integrity violation.
Tietueen revisio
Tämän sivuston tarkastetun tietueen päivityksiä, ei vahvistusta siitä, että yliopisto muutti politiikkaansa.
Seurannan julkaisuaika ei ole yliopiston politiikan voimaantulopäivä.
Mukana olevat tietueet: 7 (7 lisätty)
Akateeminen rehellisyys · Opetus · 2 aihetta lisää
UMKC does not recommend using AI detection tools as the single piece of evidence to support an academic integrity violation.
UMKC Libraries' ChatGPT student guide tells students to check with their instructor before using ChatGPT and provides citation guidance when ChatGPT is allowed in an academic assignment.
UMKC Libraries' ChatGPT student guide notes that instructors may ask for an appendix with prompts or the full transcript of a ChatGPT interaction.
UMKC CAFE's faculty AI page says instructors should have an AI usage policy outlined in the syllabus and be clear about what can and cannot be used.
UMKC recommends that instructors include a policy in all syllabi about the use and misuse of generative AI tools such as ChatGPT.
UMKC tells instructors not to upload or copy and paste student work into generative AI products for assessment because doing so may violate FERPA.
UMKC presents restrictive, supervised, and permissive generative AI syllabus policy examples and tells instructors to determine which category their syllabus may fit under.
Vertailukelpoista vanhaa ja uutta tekstiä ei ole saatavilla.
Vertailukelpoista vanhaa ja uutta tekstiä ei ole saatavilla.
Vertailukelpoista vanhaa ja uutta tekstiä ei ole saatavilla.