Lexington, United States

University of Kentucky

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Afirmaciones revisadas

5 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Kentucky in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza97%

Valor normalizado: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"University of Kentucky provides or institutionally supports Microsoft Copilot.","howToObtain":"Use the official university access path.","costToUser":"No individual price is stated.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Microsoft Copilot licenses are now available to all students, faculty and staff

Vista localizada only

Microsoft Copilot licenses are now available to all students, faculty and staff

Privacidad

UK ADVANCE research guidance says data privacy review is needed before Protected Data is entered into a generative AI tool; it also says not to put PHI into such tools unless UKHC InfoSec has confirmed HIPAA compliance and PHI support, and not to place other non-public or proprietary research data into open-source AI without UK ITS GRC approval.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza93%

Valor normalizado: protected_data_privacy_review_phi_and_nonpublic_research_data_restrictions

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Data privacy review is needed before any Protected Data (AR 10.7) is entered into a generative AI tool. Unless the UKHC InfoSec Data Sharing Committee has confirmed the AI tool is HIPAA compliant and supports PHI input, do not put research data containing PHI into a generative AI tool or other software.

Vista localizada only

UK ADVANCE requires data privacy review before Protected Data enters a generative AI tool and restricts PHI input unless compliance/support is confirmed.

Investigación

UK ADVANCE research guidance says generative AI tools may enhance research when used responsibly, generated content should be verified or validated, generative AI cannot be designated as an author, and researchers remain responsible for content and accuracy.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza91%

Valor normalizado: responsible_research_use_verification_no_ai_authorship_human_accountability

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
When using a generative AI tool, it is best practice to verify or validate all generated content using additional factors and reliable resources. Generative AI cannot be designated authorship as it cannot be held accountable.

Vista localizada only

UK ADVANCE advises validating generated research content and does not allow generative AI to be treated as accountable authorship.

Enseñanza

UK ADVANCE provides instructional generative AI guidance that includes creating and clearly communicating course policies, responding to misuse, and designing learning experiences aligned with those policies.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza90%

Valor normalizado: instructional_guidance_course_policy_recommended

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
UK ADVANCE provides the following guidance and recommendations: Understanding Capabilities and Risks; Developing Course Policies: Creating and clearly communicating course policies regarding the use of generative AI; Responding to Misuse; Designing Aligned Learning Experiences.

Vista localizada only

UK ADVANCE recommends understanding risks, creating and communicating course AI policies, responding to misuse, and aligning learning experiences.

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Kentucky CELT guidance frames student generative AI use as a course-level instructor decision and recommends communicating allowed uses, tool restrictions, citation or acknowledgement expectations, and alternatives where privacy concerns exist.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza88%

Valor normalizado: course_level_instructor_discretion_with_citation_privacy_guidance

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
It is up to the instructor to decide whether student use of generative AI (GenAI) is appropriate for their courses and to what extent. Instructors might also consider an assignment-by-assignment approach to identifying when generative AI is allowed.

Vista localizada only

CELT frames student GenAI use as an instructor decision, including assignment-by-assignment communication of allowed uses.

Source record

Fuentes oficiales

4 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Revisiónagent reviewedConfianza97%Snapshot statusNo publicadoJSONJSON público

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Kentucky AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-kentucky

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Abrir registro de cambios