University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Idioma
ENZHFRPLES

Tainan City, Taiwan

National Cheng Kung University (NCKU)

ClasificaciónQS World University Rankings 2026: =203Updated15 may 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Afirmaciones revisadas

5 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

NCKU academic-integrity guidance says faculty, students, and researchers should verify generative-AI outputs, and that using generative AI for plagiarism, fabrication, or falsification breaches academic integrity; students should follow course rules and should not submit AI-generated content as their own without permission.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza90%

Valor normalizado: genai_outputs_verified_course_rules_no_unauthorized_submission

Última verificación
15 may 2026
Último cambio
15 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
師生及研究人員使用生成式 AI 輔助生成之內容，應謹慎查驗其準確性...不允許任何使用生成式 AI 剽竊、偽造、變造數據、圖表等違反學術誠信行為。學生於學習過程中，應遵循教師在課程中關於使用生成式 AI 之規則，未經允許，不應將其生成之內容...作為自己之作業、報告、創作、展演及論文等提交。

Vista localizada only

The guideline says users should verify AI outputs, forbids AI-enabled plagiarism/fabrication/falsification, and tells students to follow course rules before submitting AI-generated content.

Idioma de la fuente
中文 (zh-Hant)
Hash de instantánea
d1f3c57b…
Recuperado
15 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
PDF section I. Upholding Academic Integrity

Investigación

NCKU guidance says faculty, students, and researchers using generative AI in research should work to ensure reproducibility and stability of research results and appropriately disclose the AI tool name, version, date, and method of use.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza90%

Valor normalizado: genai_research_disclosure_tool_name_version_date_method

Última verificación
15 may 2026
Último cambio
15 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
師生及研究人員應致力於確保研究結果和結論之可重複性與穩定性，並於研究中適當揭露 AI 工具的參與程度，如:工具名稱、版本、日期及使用方法，以利他人理解及評估研究之可靠性。

Vista localizada only

The guideline calls for reproducibility and disclosure of the AI tool name, version, date, and method of use in research.

Idioma de la fuente
中文 (zh-Hant)
Hash de instantánea
d1f3c57b…
Recuperado
15 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
PDF section II. Responsible Use and Disclosure of AI Tools

Privacidad

NCKU guidance tells faculty, students, and researchers not to provide unpublished research or sensitive content to generative AI, notes that shared data may be retained as training data, and says generative AI should be avoided in confidential research activities such as peer review or research-proposal review.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza90%

Valor normalizado: do_not_share_unpublished_sensitive_or_confidential_research_with_genai

Última verificación
15 may 2026
Último cambio
15 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
切勿將未發表之研究或機敏內容提供給生成式 AI，並應了解任何與生成式 AI 共享之資料，都可能被收錄於訓練資料庫中...在具保密義務之研究活動中(如:同儕審查、研究計畫審查)，應避免使用生成式 AI，以免影響他人或組織之權益。

Vista localizada only

The guideline warns against sharing unpublished or sensitive research with generative AI and against use in confidential research activities.

Idioma de la fuente
中文 (zh-Hant)
Hash de instantánea
d1f3c57b…
Recuperado
15 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
PDF section III. Respect for the work of others and Safeguard Privacy

Investigación

NCKU guidance says generative AI can assist with brainstorming, literature review, and manuscript polishing, but cannot replace critical thinking, decision-making, or interpretation; generative AI cannot be listed as an author or co-author, and the author/user remains fully responsible for the work.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza90%

Valor normalizado: genai_assistive_only_not_author_user_responsible

Última verificación
15 may 2026
Último cambio
15 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
生成式 AI 可以協助發想議題、查閱文獻、潤飾文稿等，但不能取代師生及研究者進行批判性思考、決策和結果詮釋...生成式 AI 不能作為作者或共同作者...即使研究中的部分內容是由生成式 AI 工具生成，研究人員也應對其研究負全部責任。

Vista localizada only

The guideline frames generative AI as assistive, not a replacement for researcher judgment, and says it cannot be an author or co-author.

Idioma de la fuente
中文 (zh-Hant)
Hash de instantánea
d1f3c57b…
Recuperado
15 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
PDF section IV. Responsible AI Use and Research Accountability

Investigación

NCKU guidance says generative-AI acceptance, use, and ethical considerations differ by discipline; faculty, students, and researchers should respect disciplinary differences and confirm a target journal's generative-AI policy before submission.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza90%

Valor normalizado: respect_disciplinary_differences_check_journal_genai_policy

Última verificación
15 may 2026
Último cambio
15 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
不同學科領域對於生成式 AI 之接受程度、使用方式及倫理考量皆有所不同，仍需學術社群自主性的規範...師生及研究人員於投稿前，務必確認該投稿期刊之生成式 AI 政策，以符合該學術社群之要求。

Vista localizada only

The guideline says generative-AI norms differ by discipline and users should check journal AI policies before submission.

Idioma de la fuente
中文 (zh-Hant)
Hash de instantánea
d1f3c57b…
Recuperado
15 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
PDF section V. Embracing Openness and Respecting Disciplinary Differences

Source record

Fuentes oficiales

2 sources

國立成功大學生成式 AI 於教學研究的學術誠信指引

aim.ncku.edu.tw

Hash de instantánea
d1f3c57b…
Record information, JSON & citation
Revisiónagent reviewedConfianza90%Snapshot statusNo publicadoJSONJSON público

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "National Cheng Kung University (NCKU) AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 15, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/national-cheng-kung-university

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Abrir registro de cambios