Maastricht, Netherlands

Maastricht University

Student guide · Task scope and procedure

Check the host faculty and assessment instructions.

The University framework and FSE faculty default have separate scopes. FSE permits restrictions and requires credible personal achievement. Research and employee data rules do not establish a student upload entitlement.

La guía siguiente está en inglés; las pruebas oficiales conservan su idioma original.

Aún no hay un resumen completo de las normas para estudiantes; consulta las afirmaciones y fuentes recopiladas.

Alcance y transición

The University framework and FSE faculty default have separate scopes. FSE permits restrictions and requires credible personal achievement. Research and employee data rules do not establish a student upload entitlement.

Check the host faculty and assessment instructions. hero illustration; exact scope and conditions are in the adjacent source-linked text.
Consulta las normas de tu facultad y de la tarea.

¿Qué ocurre si el uso de IA genera dudas?

Complemento recopilado: 2026-10-09 · Aplicabilidad actual no confirmada de forma independiente

Comparar la ficha universitaria publicada ↗

Resumen disponible actualmente en inglés

Cuándo surge una duda

Disposición sobre IAProcedimiento formalModalidad: Informativo

Interpretación del sitio

The December 2024 University framework requires programmes to assess individual achievement and follow the relevant examination-board rules at all times. It is not itself universal permission for every assignment; check the faculty and assessment instructions.

Ámbito: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

Ver original y condiciones

Ámbito: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university

II-A. Intended learning objectives reliability, validity, and transparency with the use The effect of GenAI on the intended learning of GenAI in mind. objectives (ILOs) is to be evaluated on a programme-by-programme basis. Where possible, 11. Study programmes need to consider how evaluations are carried out jointly, focusing on: examination boards will be able to determine that students have personally attained the ILOs, 6. Complementing the current ILOs on traditional given permitted use of GenAI. academic skills with relevant ILOs on the development of skills related to GenAI. 12. Definitions of fraud and plagiarism are revised in the context of GenAI, and rules developed with 7. Ensuring the relevance of the current ILOs to regard to permitted uses. the changing professional field (e.g. altered or obsolescent work processes). 13. The rules and guidelines of the relevant examination boards are followed at all times.
Ver fuente oficial ↗

Recopilado: 2026-10-09 · 215–228
SHA-256: de6a8bf74e2cbbe284f699ee4dd7b8c34529d5a576387f18ca16049142964847

Disposición sobre IAProcedimiento formalModalidad: Informativo

Interpretación del sitio

FSE’s October 2025 framework allows GenAI by default but permits restrictions to protect assessment validity, integrity or legal/ethical requirements. Students may use AI only as permitted by the assessment instructions and disclose as required. This is FSE education, including visitors taking FSE courses, not a University-wide default.

Ámbito: Faculty of Science and Engineering (FSE) · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

Ver original y condiciones

Ámbito: Staff and students in education hosted under FSE responsibility · faculty

Condiciones y excepciones

Relevant EER and University policy prevail; activities hosted elsewhere follow the host faculty unless deans agree otherwise.

Default. Generative AI may be used by default; restrictions are applied where needed to protect assessment validity, academic integrity, or legal/ethical requirements. Assessment instructions. For each assessment, the assessment instructions (assignment sheet/LMS/rubric/syllabus) state permitted uses, any conditions (incl. disclosure), and any restrictions. Responsibilities. Students and staff uphold academic integrity and comply with the assessment instructions. Support. The faculty ensures training and student support for responsible use of generative AI. 3. Requirements Teaching & Learning. Students may use generative AI by default, provided academic integrity is maintained and their own achievement remains assessable. Teaching/learning are designed assuming generative AI is available; where its use would undermine learning or assessment validity/integrity, restrictions or conditions are set in the assessment instructions. Assessment & QA. Generative AI is allowed by default; restrictions are introduced when needed to protect assessment validity, academic integrity, or legal/ethical requirements. Where generative AI use is not allowed for a specific task, the module’s assessment design, taken together, includes reasonable safeguards that make unauthorised generative AI use unlikely and ineffective for achieving a pass in the module without demonstrable personal achievement. The module assessment plans and the programme assessment plan (toetsprogramma) must demonstrate measurable attainment of module/programme ILOs and be robust to unauthorised generative- AI use. Within the PDCA cycle, programmes review changed summative assessments for generative-AI-related risks and record mitigations. Before awarding credits or the degree, the BoE must be satisfied that the assessed work credibly evidences the student’s own achievement; the BoE is not required to investigate the precise means by which the work was produced and may, on reasonable grounds to doubt authorship, require a verification assessment (e.g., oral defence or supervised reproduction). Staff retain professional autonomy within this policy; structural or substantial deviations are justified with programme leadership. Students. Students must submit work that credibly evidences their own achievement; generative AI may be used only as permitted in the assessment instructions and must be disclosed as required. Misrepresentation may constitute academic misconduct handled under the applicable programme EER and faculty/university regulations.
Ver fuente oficial ↗

Recopilado: 2026-10-09 · 15–40
SHA-256: e652b4510ff1e1b6b7c59e69f29af14d90f31a0d14692dc7ec041b22b489d3e4

This framework supplements the programme Education and Examination Regulations (EERs) and applicable university policy. In the event of any inconsistency, the relevant EER and university policy prevail. 2. Scope & applicability The policy framework applies to all activities related to teaching, learning, and assessment under the responsibility of FSE. It is intended for all teaching staff, students, support staff, and guest lecturers involved in FSE education, regardless of their primary faculty affiliation or employment contract. All FSE students and staff are expected to be familiar with this policy framework and to act in accordance with its recommendations. Where educational activities involve collaboration with other faculties or external partners, the applicable policy framework depends on where the activity takes place. Students and staff coming into FSE to take or teach courses are bound by the FSE policy framework, while FSE students and staff participating in activities hosted by another faculty are bound by that faculty’s framework, unless otherwise agreed by the deans of the respective faculties.
Ver fuente oficial ↗

Recopilado: 2026-10-09 · 64–76
SHA-256: e652b4510ff1e1b6b7c59e69f29af14d90f31a0d14692dc7ec041b22b489d3e4

Cómo responder

Disposición sobre IAProcedimiento formalModalidad: Informativo

Interpretación del sitio

Within FSE, external assistance must be acknowledged in line with assignment instructions. Where there is reasonable doubt about authorship, students may be required to provide clarification or evidence. Misrepresentation may be academic misconduct; a clarification request is not itself a proven offence.

Ámbito: FSE · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

Ver original y condiciones

Ámbito: Students in FSE-hosted educational activities · faculty

5. Policy framework for students - Students are expected to submit their own work. Where genAI is used, students must follow the assessment instructions, disclose such use when required, and uphold academic integrity. - Submitting work that does not represent a student’s own achievement prevents teaching staff and examiners from reliably assessing learning and may be treated as academic misconduct, with consequences under faculty and university regulations. - Where any external assistance is used (including AI tools, services, or people), it must be acknowledged in line with the assignment instructions. - If there is reasonable doubt about the authorship or originality of submitted work, students may be required to provide clarification or evidence that the work is genuinely their own. - Any attempt to circumvent this framework or to misrepresent achievement may be treated as academic
Ver fuente oficial ↗

Recopilado: 2026-10-09 · 135–145
SHA-256: e652b4510ff1e1b6b7c59e69f29af14d90f31a0d14692dc7ec041b22b489d3e4

Disposición sobre IAProcedimiento formalModalidad: Informativo

Interpretación del sitio

Researchers retain final accountability, observe research-integrity and data rules, and use extra caution with non-anonymized personal or privacy-sensitive information, including ethics approval when necessary. The operations section separately limits employee processing of personal/organisation-sensitive data and treats free unsecured tools as unauthorised third parties. These scopes do not create student upload permission.

Ámbito: Researchers and employees in the respective research and operations sections · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

Ver original y condiciones

Ámbito: Researchers and employees in the respective research and operations sections · university

our core values as an institution. referenced appropriately by researchers.12 Furthermore, it is important that researchers 1. Researchers hold final accountability for the disclose the use of GenAI during ethical review by ethical use of GenAI tools in their research and act the UM ethical committees (if applicable). in accordance with the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity,8 rules on the IV. Operations processing of personal data9 and all UM codes of conduct and policy,10 including the code of Beyond education and research, UM strives to conduct for data management.11 Extra caution is facilitate the responsible use of GenAI in the required when processing non-anonymized day-to-day work of all employees. personal data or privacy-sensitive information, with strict adherence to applicable regulations 1. GenAI tools are never used to process personal (see Appendix A) and, if necessary, approval from or organisation-sensitive data in the absence of the ethics committee. To avoid potential breaches transparency about how these data are used and of confidentiality, researchers should also be without safeguarding that all applicable aware that existing confidentiality agreements conditions for the use of GenAI have been met. may apply to unpublished research when using The existing rules on the handling of personal and GenAI. organisation-sensitive data apply, such as the provisions on confidentiality from the 2. Researchers need to have a solid understanding employment contract. Sensitive data may not be of the capabilities and limitations of GenAI shared with third parties. As free, unsecured AI models/applications. This does not require tools are regarded as unauthorised third parties, advanced technical expertise, but should suffice sharing information with such tools essentially to enable them to use GenAI in their research in means making that information public, which an ethical and responsible manner. To this end, amounts to a data breach.
Ver fuente oficial ↗

Recopilado: 2026-10-09 · 260–284
SHA-256: de6a8bf74e2cbbe284f699ee4dd7b8c34529d5a576387f18ca16049142964847

Recopilación y versiones

Complementos publicados basados en fuentes. Los resúmenes en inglés y las citas originales se separan del registro revisado. Los procesos y resultados posibles no son sanciones automáticas por usar IA. La aplicabilidad actual no se ha confirmado de forma independiente; compruebe el ámbito y la versión de la fuente.

Comparado con el original guardado; traducción no oficial

Los hashes permiten comparar textos guardados; no certifican vigencia ni inmutabilidad. Los temas no forman una secuencia obligatoria.

Herramientas de IA y acceso

El acceso no autoriza su uso en una evaluación. Comprueba las reglas de la tarea, los usuarios elegibles y las restricciones de datos.

Aún no hay un registro de herramientas respaldado por fuentes para esta universidad. Esto no implica indisponibilidad ni prohibición.

Reviewed record

Afirmaciones revisadas

Afirmaciones revisadas: 9

Integridad académicaAfirmaciones revisadas: 1

Academic Integrity

Maastricht University warns that using GenAI to generate content and present it as one’s own constitutes academic dishonesty.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza88%

Valor normalizado: presenting_genai_as_own_dishonesty

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Using GenAI to generate content and present it as one’s own constitutes academic dishonesty, akin to plagiarism or fraud.
DocenciaAfirmaciones revisadas: 2

Enseñanza

For education, Maastricht University says permitted GenAI uses are clearly defined at activity, course/module, study programme, and faculty levels.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza88%

Valor normalizado: permitted_uses_defined_by_level

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Permitted uses of GenAI are clearly defined at every relevant level: activity, course/module, study programme and faculty.

Enseñanza

Maastricht University says AI systems for marking/evaluating assessments and selection/admission may be used only under certain mandatory conditions that must be investigated before use.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza88%

Valor normalizado: assessment_ai_conditions_investigation

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
These AI systems may only be used under certain mandatory conditions. These conditions must be thoroughly investigated at UM before AI systems can be used to assess students or assist in selection and admission procedures.
PrivacidadAfirmaciones revisadas: 1

Privacidad

For operations, Maastricht University says GenAI tools are never used to process personal or organisation-sensitive data unless transparency and applicable safeguards are in place.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza88%

Valor normalizado: no_sensitive_data_without_safeguards

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
GenAI tools are never used to process personal or organisation-sensitive data in the absence of transparency about how these data are used and without safeguarding that all applicable conditions for the use of GenAI have been met.
InvestigaciónAfirmaciones revisadas: 2

Investigación

For research, Maastricht University says researchers hold final accountability for ethical use of GenAI tools and must act in accordance with research integrity, personal-data, and UM policy rules.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza88%

Valor normalizado: researcher_final_accountability

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Researchers hold final accountability for the ethical use of GenAI tools in their research and act in accordance with the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity, rules on the processing of personal data and all UM codes of conduct and policy.

Investigación

For research output, Maastricht University says substantial GenAI use should be communicated transparently and referenced appropriately by researchers.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza88%

Valor normalizado: research_transparency_reference

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Researchers are transparent about substantial use of GenAI in their research. This includes clear communication about the use of GenAI with supervisors, collaboration partners and other relevant stakeholders. The use of GenAI should be referenced appropriately by researchers.
Reglas para herramientas de IAAfirmaciones revisadas: 1

Ai Tool Treatment

Maastricht University facilitates and encourages GenAI use where relevant in education, research, and operations rather than prohibiting the technology.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza88%

Valor normalizado: facilitate_encourage_where_relevant

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Rather than prohibiting the technology, we facilitate and encourage its use where relevant in education, research and operations.
Estado de la fuenteAfirmaciones revisadas: 1

Source Status

Maastricht University has officially adopted a Generative AI policy framework that provides guidelines for responsible use in education, research, and operations.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza88%

Valor normalizado: officially_adopted_policy_framework

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Maastricht University has officially adopted a policy framework on Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI). This document clarifies UM’s position on GenAI and provides guidelines for its responsible use in education, research, and operations.
OtrosAfirmaciones revisadas: 1

Otro

Maastricht University states that GenAI is used at all times in compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza88%

Valor normalizado: comply_with_laws

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
GenAI is used at all times in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Where specific laws and regulations are lacking, we act in the spirit of those that do exist.

Source record

Fuentes oficiales

Fuentes: 5

Abrir la lista de fuentes oficiales
Información, JSON y cita
RevisiónRevisión asistida por IAConfianza88%Estado de la instantáneaNo publicadoJSONJSON público

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Maastricht University AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 15, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/maastricht-university

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Abrir registro de cambios

Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.