academic_integrity
VUB's 2025-2026 Education and Examination Regulations classify as an irregularity fraud involving statements or texts produced by generative AI applications without reference to original sources.
Revisión: Revisado por un agente
Registro de cambios
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Resumen de cambios
Estado actual de actualización y revisión del registro público.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 16 may 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
Esta página combina todas las diferencias de versiones públicas para Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB). Las instantáneas individuales de lanzamiento siguen disponibles desde sus URL específicas del lanzamiento.
Aún no se han registrado filas de diferencias de políticas entre versiones para esta universidad. La página sigue rastreando afirmaciones respaldadas por fuentes actuales, atribuciones de fuentes oficiales, estado de revisión, actualidad de las fuentes y JSON públicas para su descubrimiento y citación.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Las afirmaciones extraídas recientemente son adiciones al seguimiento y no necesariamente han sido publicadas por la universidad. Los cambios en las instantáneas de origen muestran cambios de hash para la misma URL de origen y no constituyen por sí mismos cambios en la política.
Categorías de diferencias
Clasificación semántica para esta diferencia de versión.
Diferencias de versión combinadas
Diferencia del seguimiento unificado generada a partir de todas las instantáneas de lanzamiento público para esta universidad.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) combined release diferencias
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+10-0
11 # Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) AI policy record
2+research: VUB's research AI guidelines say researchers must provide the greatest possible degree of transparency on AI tool use in scientific activities.
3+Evidence (en, 87abaed132b7): Researchers must provide the greatest possible degree of transparency on the use of AI tools in their scientific activities. This means that the way AI tools are used often needs to be described in detail in the Materials & Methods section and/or Supplementary Data, including prompts, output, name and version of the AI tool.
4+academic_integrity: VUB's 2025-2026 Education and Examination Regulations classify as an irregularity fraud involving statements or texts produced by generative AI applications without reference to original sources.
5+Evidence (en, 9c36448fe92b): Any form of fraud that constitutes a breach of scientific integrity, including the use of statements or texts produced by generative AI applications without reference to original sources, or the simulation or falsification of research data, is deemed an irregularity as referred to in this article.
6+research: VUB's public AI guidelines are scoped to generative AI use in research processes and explicitly state that they do not apply to education.
7+Evidence (en, fd15157c660d): The purpose of these guidelines is to assist researchers in the appropriate use of generative AI in their day-to-day research activities. They are applicable to use of generative AI in research processes. They do not apply to education.
8+research: For research processes, VUB says it supports and encourages researchers' use of AI tools while also warning about limitations and risks.
9+Evidence (en, 87abaed132b7): The VUB supports and encourages the use of AI tools by researchers. Our university would also like to point out to researchers the limitations and risks that the use of AI tools in research processes can entail.
10+privacy: VUB's research AI guidelines say researchers should not enter personal data into AI tools.
11+Evidence (en, 87abaed132b7): Researchers serve not to enter the following data in AI tools : o Personal data: data that can (directly or indirectly) lead to the identification of persons
Historial de versiones
0 public release diffs
Cambios en las afirmaciones
5 Afirmación registros
privacy
VUB's research AI guidelines say researchers should not enter personal data into AI tools.
Revisión: Revisado por un agente
research
VUB's research AI guidelines say researchers must provide the greatest possible degree of transparency on AI tool use in scientific activities.
Revisión: Revisado por un agente
research
For research processes, VUB says it supports and encourages researchers' use of AI tools while also warning about limitations and risks.
Revisión: Revisado por un agente
research
VUB's public AI guidelines are scoped to generative AI use in research processes and explicitly state that they do not apply to education.
Revisión: Revisado por un agente
Instantáneas de origen
3 source attributions
AI Guidelines
official_guidance Tracker checked at 16 may 2026, 5:06
Education and Examination Regulations 2025-2026
official_policy_page Tracker checked at 16 may 2026, 5:09
Responsible use of artificial intelligence for research purposes
official_pdf Tracker checked at 16 may 2026, 5:07