University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Idioma
ENZHFRPLES

Registro de cambios

University of Regina

Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteÚltima verificación25 may 2026Último cambio25 may 2026Afirmaciones8Fuentes5Última versiónpublic-release-20260526-003Registros de versiones1
Página universitariaJSON públicoInforme mensualÍndice universitario

Resumen de cambios

Estado actual de actualización y revisión del registro público.

University of Regina currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 25 may 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 8 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.

Esta página combina todas las diferencias de versiones públicas para University of Regina. Las instantáneas individuales de lanzamiento siguen disponibles desde sus URL específicas del lanzamiento.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Las afirmaciones extraídas recientemente son adiciones al seguimiento y no necesariamente han sido publicadas por la universidad. Los cambios en las instantáneas de origen muestran cambios de hash para la misma URL de origen y no constituyen por sí mismos cambios en la política.

Categorías de diferencias

Clasificación semántica para esta diferencia de versión.

Texto de la política0Extraído recientemente8Evidencia0Instantáneas de origen0Texto de origen0Fuente añadida5Fuente eliminada0

Diferencias de versión combinadas

Diferencia del seguimiento unificado generada a partir de todas las instantáneas de lanzamiento público para esta universidad.

Universidad of Regina combined release diferencias

Comparando public-release-20260526-001 con public-release-20260526-003.

+34-0
11 # University of Regina AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: University of Regina CTL guidance says Turnitin is the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool, the AI-detection report is not conclusive proof of academic misconduct, and instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for AI detection.
5+Evidence (en, 165d1213815a): Due to the unreliability of AI-detection tools, and the possibility of false positives, the AI-detection report cannot be considered conclusive proof of academic misconduct... Turnitin is presently the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool and... instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for the purpose of AI-detection.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:19.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+privacy: University of Regina policy treats data used to develop, operate, share, manage, or record GenAI systems as institutional data that must align with the University's Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy policy and data handling standards.
10+Evidence (en, 0bc7c3847989): Data used to develop algorithms or GenAI systems, and any data generated, shared, managed and/or recorded as part of an GenAI system's operation or algorithm, will be considered institutional data and must be managed in alignment with GOV-060-005 Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy policy and the University's data handling standards.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:16.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+ai_tool_treatment: University of Regina policy OPS-080-050 says all University use of generative AI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure, and compliant with applicable laws and regulations; the policy primarily addresses governance and operations uses by employees.
15+Evidence (en, 0bc7c3847989): This policy applies to the development, approval, use and management of GenAI software, systems, or platforms that may be used by University of Regina employees... All University use of GenAI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure and compliant with applicable laws and regulations.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:16.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+security_review: For GenAI projects or systems, University of Regina employees are directed to identify, assess, and analyze risks including privacy and security, and University-wide GenAI projects, tools, systems, or intended enterprise-data uses require approval through established IT project approval processes.
20+Evidence (en, 0bc7c3847989): Any employee who is considering a GenAI project or system must identify, assess and analyze risks and opportunities... including privacy and security. Any University-wide GenAI project, tool, system or intended use of enterprise-level data requires approval through established IT project approval processes.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:16.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+teaching: University of Regina CTL guidance for faculty and instructors recommends that instructors set clear GenAI rules and syllabus statements, require students to disclose AI use when incorporated into coursework, and protect student privacy and intellectual property in teaching uses of GenAI.
25+Evidence (en, 165d1213815a): It is strongly recommended that instructors incorporate a statement on the use of generative AI into course syllabi... Instructors should require students to disclose when and how they've incorporated AI into their coursework... Instructors should also endeavour to protect the privacy and intellectual property of students in any use of generative AI in teaching.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:19.000Z
1227 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1328 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
29+academic_integrity: Archer Library's student-facing GenAI guidance tells students to check whether they have permission to use AI in their program or coursework, follow assignment instructions, verify GenAI output accuracy, and cite GenAI in their work.
30+Evidence (en, b1121fb5f16d): These questions will guide you in determining whether or not use is acceptable: 1. Do you have permission to use AI in your program or course work? 2. Have you followed the assignment instructions? ... 4. Have you checked if the GenAI output is accurate? 5. Have you cited GenAI in your work?
31+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:20.000Z
1432 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1533 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
34+academic_integrity: Archer Library's GenAI citation guide says AI-generated materials should generally be treated as a non-recoverable source and/or akin to personal communication, while students should check with their instructor if in doubt about when to cite AI and which style to use.
35+Evidence (en, 2cd38ba0cea8): In general, though, you should treat AI-generated materials as a non-recoverable source and/or akin to personal communication... As always, please be sure to check with your instructor if in doubt about when to cite AI and what style to use.
36+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:21.000Z
1637 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1738 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
39+academic_integrity: The University of Regina Provost's message to students says individual instructors may determine whether and to what extent AI is permitted in course work, and warns that improper or unauthorized AI use can constitute academic misconduct.
40+Evidence (en, 5668f134e50a): Individual instructors may determine whether the use of AI will be permitted, and to what extent, when it comes to assigned course work... improper or unauthorized use of AI can constitute academic misconduct.
41+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:18.000Z
1842 ## Source attribution added
1943 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
44+Source https://library.uregina.ca/ai/cite snapshot 2cd38ba0cea8af0951c471e8832911c462d4a3a9363a7a5cab2cee0c8452f767
45+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:21.000Z
2046 ## Source attribution added
2147 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
48+Source https://library.uregina.ca/ai/use snapshot b1121fb5f16de36348403db0263b0b05845a1b6d21c3efa341bf287d0a86a275
49+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:20.000Z
2250 ## Source attribution added
2351 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
52+Source https://www.uregina.ca/generative-ai-hub/instructor-resources.html snapshot 165d1213815a7524b0561aca56313418d2c6d09eaf8986654cc21f5da6bc5c73
53+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-27T02:40:00.000Z
2454 ## Source attribution added
2555 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
56+Source https://www.uregina.ca/policy/browse-policy/policy-ops-080-050.html snapshot 0bc7c384798934b20ad30a5b1954882ae77fb5a8e43aee814f4397e5a5641849
57+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:16.000Z
2658 ## Source attribution added
2759 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
60+Source https://www.uregina.ca/stories/2024/02/academic-integrity-and-artificial-intelligence.html snapshot 5668f134e50a7c202b2cd0acbe9d3f1e12a6e35c4843b54a0892c735d4a74a65
61+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:18.000Z

Historial de versiones

1 diferencia de lanzamiento público

public-release-20260526-003

Comparado con public-release-20260526-001.

Texto de la política0Extraído recientemente8Instantáneas de origen0Texto de origen0
Diferencias de la versiónDiferencia JSON

Universidad of Regina public-release-20260526-003 diferencias

Comparando public-release-20260526-001 con public-release-20260526-003.

+34-0
11 # University of Regina AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: University of Regina CTL guidance says Turnitin is the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool, the AI-detection report is not conclusive proof of academic misconduct, and instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for AI detection.
5+Evidence (en, 165d1213815a): Due to the unreliability of AI-detection tools, and the possibility of false positives, the AI-detection report cannot be considered conclusive proof of academic misconduct... Turnitin is presently the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool and... instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for the purpose of AI-detection.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:19.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+privacy: University of Regina policy treats data used to develop, operate, share, manage, or record GenAI systems as institutional data that must align with the University's Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy policy and data handling standards.
10+Evidence (en, 0bc7c3847989): Data used to develop algorithms or GenAI systems, and any data generated, shared, managed and/or recorded as part of an GenAI system's operation or algorithm, will be considered institutional data and must be managed in alignment with GOV-060-005 Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy policy and the University's data handling standards.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:16.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+ai_tool_treatment: University of Regina policy OPS-080-050 says all University use of generative AI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure, and compliant with applicable laws and regulations; the policy primarily addresses governance and operations uses by employees.
15+Evidence (en, 0bc7c3847989): This policy applies to the development, approval, use and management of GenAI software, systems, or platforms that may be used by University of Regina employees... All University use of GenAI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure and compliant with applicable laws and regulations.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:16.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+security_review: For GenAI projects or systems, University of Regina employees are directed to identify, assess, and analyze risks including privacy and security, and University-wide GenAI projects, tools, systems, or intended enterprise-data uses require approval through established IT project approval processes.
20+Evidence (en, 0bc7c3847989): Any employee who is considering a GenAI project or system must identify, assess and analyze risks and opportunities... including privacy and security. Any University-wide GenAI project, tool, system or intended use of enterprise-level data requires approval through established IT project approval processes.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:16.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+teaching: University of Regina CTL guidance for faculty and instructors recommends that instructors set clear GenAI rules and syllabus statements, require students to disclose AI use when incorporated into coursework, and protect student privacy and intellectual property in teaching uses of GenAI.
25+Evidence (en, 165d1213815a): It is strongly recommended that instructors incorporate a statement on the use of generative AI into course syllabi... Instructors should require students to disclose when and how they've incorporated AI into their coursework... Instructors should also endeavour to protect the privacy and intellectual property of students in any use of generative AI in teaching.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:19.000Z
1227 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1328 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
29+academic_integrity: Archer Library's student-facing GenAI guidance tells students to check whether they have permission to use AI in their program or coursework, follow assignment instructions, verify GenAI output accuracy, and cite GenAI in their work.
30+Evidence (en, b1121fb5f16d): These questions will guide you in determining whether or not use is acceptable: 1. Do you have permission to use AI in your program or course work? 2. Have you followed the assignment instructions? ... 4. Have you checked if the GenAI output is accurate? 5. Have you cited GenAI in your work?
31+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:20.000Z
1432 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1533 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
34+academic_integrity: Archer Library's GenAI citation guide says AI-generated materials should generally be treated as a non-recoverable source and/or akin to personal communication, while students should check with their instructor if in doubt about when to cite AI and which style to use.
35+Evidence (en, 2cd38ba0cea8): In general, though, you should treat AI-generated materials as a non-recoverable source and/or akin to personal communication... As always, please be sure to check with your instructor if in doubt about when to cite AI and what style to use.
36+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:21.000Z
1637 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1738 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
39+academic_integrity: The University of Regina Provost's message to students says individual instructors may determine whether and to what extent AI is permitted in course work, and warns that improper or unauthorized AI use can constitute academic misconduct.
40+Evidence (en, 5668f134e50a): Individual instructors may determine whether the use of AI will be permitted, and to what extent, when it comes to assigned course work... improper or unauthorized use of AI can constitute academic misconduct.
41+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:18.000Z
1842 ## Source attribution added
1943 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
44+Source https://library.uregina.ca/ai/cite snapshot 2cd38ba0cea8af0951c471e8832911c462d4a3a9363a7a5cab2cee0c8452f767
45+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:21.000Z
2046 ## Source attribution added
2147 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
48+Source https://library.uregina.ca/ai/use snapshot b1121fb5f16de36348403db0263b0b05845a1b6d21c3efa341bf287d0a86a275
49+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:20.000Z
2250 ## Source attribution added
2351 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
52+Source https://www.uregina.ca/generative-ai-hub/instructor-resources.html snapshot 165d1213815a7524b0561aca56313418d2c6d09eaf8986654cc21f5da6bc5c73
53+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-27T02:40:00.000Z
2454 ## Source attribution added
2555 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
56+Source https://www.uregina.ca/policy/browse-policy/policy-ops-080-050.html snapshot 0bc7c384798934b20ad30a5b1954882ae77fb5a8e43aee814f4397e5a5641849
57+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:16.000Z
2658 ## Source attribution added
2759 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
60+Source https://www.uregina.ca/stories/2024/02/academic-integrity-and-artificial-intelligence.html snapshot 5668f134e50a7c202b2cd0acbe9d3f1e12a6e35c4843b54a0892c735d4a74a65
61+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:18.000Z

Cambios en las afirmaciones

8 Afirmación registros

privacy

University of Regina policy treats data used to develop, operate, share, manage, or record GenAI systems as institutional data that must align with the University's Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy policy and data handling standards.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza95%Evidencia1Idiomasen

ai_tool_treatment

University of Regina policy OPS-080-050 says all University use of generative AI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure, and compliant with applicable laws and regulations; the policy primarily addresses governance and operations uses by employees.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%Evidencia1Idiomasen

security_review

For GenAI projects or systems, University of Regina employees are directed to identify, assess, and analyze risks including privacy and security, and University-wide GenAI projects, tools, systems, or intended enterprise-data uses require approval through established IT project approval processes.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza93%Evidencia1Idiomasen

ai_tool_treatment

University of Regina CTL guidance says Turnitin is the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool, the AI-detection report is not conclusive proof of academic misconduct, and instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for AI detection.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza93%Evidencia1Idiomasen

academic_integrity

The University of Regina Provost's message to students says individual instructors may determine whether and to what extent AI is permitted in course work, and warns that improper or unauthorized AI use can constitute academic misconduct.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza92%Evidencia1Idiomasen

teaching

University of Regina CTL guidance for faculty and instructors recommends that instructors set clear GenAI rules and syllabus statements, require students to disclose AI use when incorporated into coursework, and protect student privacy and intellectual property in teaching uses of GenAI.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza89%Evidencia1Idiomasen

academic_integrity

Archer Library's student-facing GenAI guidance tells students to check whether they have permission to use AI in their program or coursework, follow assignment instructions, verify GenAI output accuracy, and cite GenAI in their work.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza86%Evidencia1Idiomasen

academic_integrity

Archer Library's GenAI citation guide says AI-generated materials should generally be treated as a non-recoverable source and/or akin to personal communication, while students should check with their instructor if in doubt about when to cite AI and which style to use.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza84%Evidencia1Idiomasen

Instantáneas de origen

5 source attributions

Artificial Intelligence: Citing Generative AI

official_guidance Tracker checked at 25 may 2026, 6:24

Hash de instantánea
2cd38ba0cea8af0951c471e8832911c462d4a3a9363a7a5cab2cee0c8452f767

Artificial Intelligence: Using Generative AI

official_guidance Tracker checked at 25 may 2026, 6:24

Hash de instantánea
b1121fb5f16de36348403db0263b0b05845a1b6d21c3efa341bf287d0a86a275