University AI Policy Tracker

Registros abiertos y basados en evidencia sobre politicas universitarias de IA.

APIGitHub
Idioma
ENZHFRPL

Change log

University of Naples - Federico II

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Claims7Sources2Release records0
University pagePublic JSONMonthly reportUniversity index

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Naples - Federico II currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for University of Naples - Federico II. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

University of Naples - Federico II combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+14-0
11 # University of Naples - Federico II AI policy record
2+source_status: University of Naples Federico II has published university-wide first guidelines for use of artificial intelligence systems inside the university, approved by the Academic Senate after a favorable Board of Directors opinion.
3+Evidence (it, d930fb2bd039): con delibera n. 31 del 26.11.2025, sono state approvate dal Senato Accademico, previo parere favorevole del Consiglio di Amministrazione, espresso in pari data con delibera n. 86, le Prime linee guida per l'utilizzo dei Sistemi di Intelligenza Artificiale
4+teaching: For teaching staff and similar roles, the guidelines allow AI as support for teaching preparation and content or exercise generation with human supervision and labeling, but prohibit using AI to perform evaluations.
5+Evidence (it, d930fb2bd039): Si può utilizzare l'IA a supporto della didattica, per la preparazione e l'erogazione di contenuti didattici e per la generazione di esercizi, domande, questionari, con l'obbligo di supervisione umana dell'output e delle fonti, nonché di etichettatura del materiale generato. È vietato l'impiego dell'IA per effettuare valutazioni.
6+academic_integrity: For students and similar figures, the guidelines say AI may be used only as support for study and learning, and AI-generated content for assessments or theses is not permitted without explicit declaration and authorization from the responsible teacher.
7+Evidence (it, d930fb2bd039): Per gli studenti, l'IA può essere esclusivamente uno strumento di supporto allo studio e all'apprendimento... non è consentito ricorrere alla IA per generare qualsiasi contenuto destinato a prove di valutazione o tesi senza dichiarazione esplicita e senza l'autorizzazione del docente responsabile.
8+privacy: The guidelines state that AI systems used within the university must include contractual guarantees that user-provided data are not used to train LLMs except with specific authorization, and they prohibit entering special categories of personal data in prompts.
9+Evidence (it, d930fb2bd039): I sistemi di intelligenza artificiale utilizzabili all'interno dell'Ateneo devono prevedere, nel relativo contratto o accordo di fornitura, la garanzia esplicita che i dati forniti dagli utenti non vengano utilizzati per l'addestramento dei modelli linguistici (LLM), salvo specifiche e puntuali autorizzazioni da parte del CSI e del DPO di Ateneo.
10+research: For research, the guidelines say AI can support research activities, but researchers remain fully responsible for originality, content, methodological quality, accuracy, ethics, and integrity, and an AI system cannot be considered an author or co-author of scientific publications.
11+Evidence (it, d930fb2bd039): resta piena responsabilità dei ricercatori garantire che l'utilizzo della IA sia coerente con i principi di integrità scientifica della ricerca... Un sistema di intelligenza artificiale non può essere considerato autore o coautore di pubblicazioni scientifiche.
12+ai_tool_treatment: The guidelines list OpenAI ChatGPT Edu/Enterprise, Microsoft Copilot, and other CSI-approved tools under CRUI framework agreements as AI systems available to the university.
13+Evidence (it, d930fb2bd039): L'Ateneo dispone dei seguenti sistemi di intelligenza artificiale autorizzati e gestiti secondo gli accordi CRUI in vigore: OpenAI - ChatGPT Edu / ChatGPT Enterprise; Microsoft Copilot; Eventuali altri strumenti di IA generativa o assistiva approvati dal CSI
14+other: The guidelines state that each user is responsible for correct AI-tool use in their area of competence and that failure to comply with the guidelines is a violation of behavioral obligations subject to disciplinary responsibility under applicable role-specific rules.
15+Evidence (it, d930fb2bd039): La responsabilità circa il corretto utilizzo degli strumenti di IA all'interno dell'Ateneo è in capo a ciascun utente, per gli ambiti di rispettiva competenza... Il mancato rispetto di quanto previsto dalle presenti linee guida rappresenta una violazione degli obblighi di comportamento ed è soggetto... a responsabilità disciplinare

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

7 claim records

source_status

University of Naples Federico II has published university-wide first guidelines for use of artificial intelligence systems inside the university, approved by the Academic Senate after a favorable Board of Directors opinion.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesit

teaching

For teaching staff and similar roles, the guidelines allow AI as support for teaching preparation and content or exercise generation with human supervision and labeling, but prohibit using AI to perform evaluations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesit

academic_integrity

For students and similar figures, the guidelines say AI may be used only as support for study and learning, and AI-generated content for assessments or theses is not permitted without explicit declaration and authorization from the responsible teacher.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesit

privacy

The guidelines state that AI systems used within the university must include contractual guarantees that user-provided data are not used to train LLMs except with specific authorization, and they prohibit entering special categories of personal data in prompts.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesit

research

For research, the guidelines say AI can support research activities, but researchers remain fully responsible for originality, content, methodological quality, accuracy, ethics, and integrity, and an AI system cannot be considered an author or co-author of scientific publications.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesit

ai_tool_treatment

The guidelines list OpenAI ChatGPT Edu/Enterprise, Microsoft Copilot, and other CSI-approved tools under CRUI framework agreements as AI systems available to the university.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesit

other

The guidelines state that each user is responsible for correct AI-tool use in their area of competence and that failure to comply with the guidelines is a violation of behavioral obligations subject to disciplinary responsibility under applicable role-specific rules.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesit

Source snapshots

2 source attributions