Change log

University of Gothenburg

Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Gothenburg currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.

No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.

Claim changes

8 claim records

academic_integrity

The University of Gothenburg study-rules PDF states that, for take-home examinations, written tasks, or equivalent, AI-generated content may not be presented as one’s own work and examiners should specify the limits for permitted use of generative AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

University of Gothenburg student guidance says the university does not prohibit generative AI in education; teachers and examiners decide whether, when, and how it may be used in coursework and examinations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagessv

teaching

University of Gothenburg student guidance says generative-AI guidelines vary between courses, programmes, departments, and faculties, and that teachers and examiners are responsible for communicating those guidelines to students.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagessv

academic_integrity

University of Gothenburg student guidance on cheating says generative AI use counts as cheating when it is used to complete an examination task the student is expected to do independently, to present AI-generated material as the student’s own work, or in other ways prohibited in the course or programme.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagessv

ai_tool_treatment

University of Gothenburg PIL guidance says all staff and students have access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, employees have access to ChatGPT Edu, and Microsoft 365 Copilot can be requested with manager approval because its cost is charged to the department or equivalent.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

University of Gothenburg student guidance says the university does not recommend checking student work with an AI-detection tool because existing tools are unreliable.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagessv

ai_tool_treatment

A University of Gothenburg PIL page says that, for examinations, the university regards generative AI as a tool and applies the university’s rules for first- and second-cycle studies.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagessv

privacy

University of Gothenburg PIL guidance advises caution with services not offered through the university because they have not been reviewed for legal or security issues, and says users should not share personal data or sensitive information; the page says this also applied to Microsoft Bing Chat/Copilot at the time of publication.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

5 source attributions

University of Gothenburg AI Policy Tracker Release Diff | University AI Policy Tracker