academic_integrity
The University of Bath Academic Integrity Statement requires students submitting assessment to confirm they have not presented content created by generative AI tools as though it were their own work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
University of Bath
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
University of Bath currently has 9 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
Claim changes
9 claim records
ai_tool_treatment
University of Bath assessment guidance uses ABC GenAI categories: Type A means GenAI is not permitted, Type B means optional assistive use for specific defined processes, and Type C means GenAI is integral to the assessment.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
University of Bath teaching guidance says that from 2026/27 it will move to a two-lane approach, with a closed lane where GenAI must not be used and an open lane where GenAI engagement is necessary or optional.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
University of Bath staff guidance says confidential or commercially sensitive data should never be shared with AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
University of Bath staff guidance says Microsoft Copilot accessed through a university login does not collect chat logs or data or train the wider model, and it advises using Copilot in preference to other tools when handling student data.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
For the 2025/26 transition year, University of Bath teaching guidance says course documentation should keep ABC labels and add a short AI-use statement to B and C coursework briefs.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
University of Bath staff guidance says summative grading and feedback may involve GenAI for editing or augmentation, but both the initial and final judgment should rest with academic staff.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
University of Bath two-lane FAQ guidance says GenAI misuse in open-lane assessments is not misconduct by itself, but can contribute to plagiarism, fabrication, or collusion.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
University of Bath Teaching Hub guidance says Microsoft Copilot is the only generative AI tool made available to all University staff, when accessed with a Bath login.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
6 source attributions
Academic Integrity Statement
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 1:56 PM
GenAI A, B, C Assessment Categorisations Guidance and Template Text - Learning and Teaching Hub
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 1:56 PM
Introduction to Microsoft Copilot - Learning and Teaching Hub
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 1:56 PM
Staff Guidance on the Ethical and Legal use of GenAI - Learning and Teaching Hub
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 1:56 PM
The Two-Lane Approach to GenAI Assessment Categorisation - Learning and Teaching Hub
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 1:56 PM
The Two-Lane Approach to Generative AI and Assessment: Frequently Asked Questions - Learning and Teaching Hub
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 1:56 PM