privacy
Purdue requires prior approval before Sensitive or Restricted Data is entered into AI tools, including training or testing AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Purdue University
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Purdue University currently has 11 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for Purdue University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Purdue University combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+20-0
11 # Purdue University AI policy record
2+privacy: Purdue requires prior approval before Sensitive or Restricted Data is entered into AI tools, including training or testing AI tools.
3+Evidence (en, 2a9bc01844dc): Sensitive and Restricted Data, as defined in the Acceptable Use policy, must not be entered into AI tools without prior approval. Usage cases include training or testing AI tools.
4+other: Purdue allows AI to inform decision makers, but the AI Use policy says AI must not be the sole factor in personnel, award, or disciplinary decisions.
5+Evidence (en, 2a9bc01844dc): AI may be used to inform decision makers, but it must not be the sole factor used in making personnel, award or disciplinary decisions.
6+procurement: Purdue requires a New IT Solutions and Services Review for AI tools not already on the approved AI tools list, whether developed externally or internally.
7+Evidence (en, 2a9bc01844dc): A New IT Solutions and Services Review is required for use of any AI tools, whether developed externally or internally, not already on the approved AI tools list.
8+ai_tool_treatment: Purdue's AI Use policy treats AI tools and university data used with them as IT Resources and Information Assets subject to Purdue acceptable-use and security/privacy policy controls.
9+Evidence (en, 2a9bc01844dc): AI tools and the university data used with them are IT Resources and Information Assets, respectively, as defined within and subject to the Acceptable Use policy.
10+teaching: Purdue teaching guidance says instructors should determine and tell students when AI use is authorized or unauthorized; authorization is determined at the course level.
11+Evidence (en, c1008eb0705b): The instructor, therefore, should determine and inform students when the use of AI is authorized or unauthorized. Authorization is determined at the course level by the instructor.
12+academic_integrity: Purdue teaching guidance warns that an AI-detection positive result should not be the sole determining factor for an academic-integrity violation and subsequent consequences.
13+Evidence (en, c1008eb0705b): a positive result from one of these tools is not the sole determining factor of an academic integrity violation and subsequent consequences.
14+privacy: Purdue teaching guidance says instructors should commit to never sharing personally identifiable student information with third-party AI tools.
15+Evidence (en, c1008eb0705b): Commit to never sharing personally identifiable information about students with any third-party AI tool
16+security_review: Purdue says AI use cases that use Purdue data or make decisions on behalf of humans must be reviewed and approved by the Data Ethics Committee.
17+Evidence (en, 981126e39c50): Purdue University policy requires AI use cases that use Purdue data and/or make decisions on behalf of humans must be reviewed and approved by the Data Ethics Committee.
18+teaching: Purdue teaching guidance says instructors should include specific syllabus guidance on allowable AI-tool use, learning-process use, detection approaches, and potential consequences.
19+Evidence (en, c1008eb0705b): On the course syllabus, instructors should include specific guidance on: Allowable use of AI tools by students for assessed work in the course.
20+privacy: Purdue's AI toolkit tells users to treat data entered into AI tools as potentially public and not to input sensitive, confidential, or restricted data through the listed tools.
21+Evidence (en, 8372412f2bb9): When using AI tools, including those listed here, you should treat all data entered as potentially public. Do not input or process any sensitive, confidential or restricted data through these tools.
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
11 claim records
other
Purdue allows AI to inform decision makers, but the AI Use policy says AI must not be the sole factor in personnel, award, or disciplinary decisions.
Review: Agent reviewed
procurement
Purdue requires a New IT Solutions and Services Review for AI tools not already on the approved AI tools list, whether developed externally or internally.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
Purdue's AI Use policy treats AI tools and university data used with them as IT Resources and Information Assets subject to Purdue acceptable-use and security/privacy policy controls.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Purdue teaching guidance says instructors should determine and tell students when AI use is authorized or unauthorized; authorization is determined at the course level.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
Purdue teaching guidance warns that an AI-detection positive result should not be the sole determining factor for an academic-integrity violation and subsequent consequences.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
Purdue teaching guidance says instructors should commit to never sharing personally identifiable student information with third-party AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
security_review
Purdue says AI use cases that use Purdue data or make decisions on behalf of humans must be reviewed and approved by the Data Ethics Committee.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Purdue teaching guidance says instructors should include specific syllabus guidance on allowable AI-tool use, learning-process use, detection approaches, and potential consequences.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
Purdue's AI toolkit tells users to treat data entered into AI tools as potentially public and not to input sensitive, confidential, or restricted data through the listed tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
Purdue's AI toolkit lists GenAI Studio, Copilot Chat, Teams Premium, M365 Copilot, and Scite as Purdue University AI tools with access terms for users.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
5 source attributions
AI Governance and Review
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 2:13 AM
Application of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use Policy
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 2:13 AM
Artificial Intelligence Use (VII.A.5)
official_policy_page Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 2:13 AM
Generative AI Toolkit
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 2:13 AM
Guidance on the Use of AI in Teaching and Learning
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 2:13 AM