privacy
Purdue requires prior approval before Sensitive or Restricted Data is entered into AI tools, including training or testing AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Purdue University
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Purdue University currently has 11 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
Claim changes
11 claim records
other
Purdue allows AI to inform decision makers, but the AI Use policy says AI must not be the sole factor in personnel, award, or disciplinary decisions.
Review: Agent reviewed
procurement
Purdue requires a New IT Solutions and Services Review for AI tools not already on the approved AI tools list, whether developed externally or internally.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
Purdue's AI Use policy treats AI tools and university data used with them as IT Resources and Information Assets subject to Purdue acceptable-use and security/privacy policy controls.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Purdue teaching guidance says instructors should determine and tell students when AI use is authorized or unauthorized; authorization is determined at the course level.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
Purdue teaching guidance warns that an AI-detection positive result should not be the sole determining factor for an academic-integrity violation and subsequent consequences.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
Purdue teaching guidance says instructors should commit to never sharing personally identifiable student information with third-party AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
security_review
Purdue says AI use cases that use Purdue data or make decisions on behalf of humans must be reviewed and approved by the Data Ethics Committee.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Purdue teaching guidance says instructors should include specific syllabus guidance on allowable AI-tool use, learning-process use, detection approaches, and potential consequences.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
Purdue's AI toolkit tells users to treat data entered into AI tools as potentially public and not to input sensitive, confidential, or restricted data through the listed tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
Purdue's AI toolkit lists GenAI Studio, Copilot Chat, Teams Premium, M365 Copilot, and Scite as Purdue University AI tools with access terms for users.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
5 source attributions
AI Governance and Review
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 2:13 AM
Application of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use Policy
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 2:13 AM
Artificial Intelligence Use (VII.A.5)
official_policy_page Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 2:13 AM
Generative AI Toolkit
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 2:13 AM
Guidance on the Use of AI in Teaching and Learning
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 2:13 AM