Añadido
The guidelines state that authors remain fully responsible for verifying the accuracy of AI-assisted work, rigorously fact-checking it and proactively confirming it is free from plagiarism.
Historial del registro
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD)
Actualizaciones de los datos revisados de este sitio; no confirman que la universidad haya cambiado su política.
Revisiones coincidentes: 1
Registros afectados: 7 (7 añadidos)
Revisión: public-release-20260727-015Ver revisión
Qué significa esta actualización
Registros afectados: 7 (7 añadidos)
Reglas para herramientas de IA · Integridad académica · 2 temas más
Integridad académica · Registros afectados: 2 (2 añadidos)
Añadido
Course-level plagiarism policies are expected to set differentiated consequences for AI misuse while rewarding honest, responsible engagement with AI tools.
Docencia · Registros afectados: 2 (2 añadidos)
Añadido
IIT Delhi's committee holds that outright restriction of GenAI tools is neither enforceable nor desirable and recommends that each course instructor develop their own plagiarism policy governing AI use.
Añadido
Academic Units are advised to reevaluate assessment methods, prioritizing approaches that AI tools cannot easily replicate.
Privacidad · Registros afectados: 1 (1 añadidos)
Añadido
The guidelines direct all users to exercise caution when entering data into GenAI tools and to screen out sensitive or private details before use.
Abrir historial de la revisiónReglas para herramientas de IA · Registros afectados: 2 (2 añadidos)
Añadido
IIT Delhi's GenAI guidelines call for full disclosure of any work or content generated with the assistance of GenAI tools, including noting AI-created images, tables, data visualizations, or significant text sections.
Añadido
The committee recommends that IIT Delhi acquire institute-wide licenses for paid GenAI tools such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot to ensure equitable access.