No hay textos anterior y nuevo comparables.
Shared V6 reading layout and evidence presentation updated. University policy Claims, original evidence, held decisions and snapshot approvals remain unchanged; the institution audit remains PARTIAL.
Historial del registro
Actualizaciones de los datos revisados de este sitio; no confirman que la universidad haya cambiado su política.
Revisiones coincidentes: 4
Actualización de página
Revisión: v6-reading-rankings-ten-20261027No hay textos anterior y nuevo comparables.
Shared V6 reading layout and evidence presentation updated. University policy Claims, original evidence, held decisions and snapshot approvals remain unchanged; the institution audit remains PARTIAL.
Registros afectados: 17 (14 corregidos / ajustados · 3 añadidos)
Revisión: imperial-20261011-r2Registros afectados: 17 (14 corregidos / ajustados · 3 añadidos)
Reglas para herramientas de IA · Integridad académica · 4 temas más
Imperial's Academic Misconduct procedures govern the investigation of suspected misconduct, potential sanctions, and applicable appeal rights. Students challenging an Academic Misconduct Panel decision must submit an appeal within ten College working days of notification; the general academic-results appeal procedure (with a 15 working-day window) does not apply to misconduct decisions. Potential misconduct in postgraduate research programmes is dealt with under Ordinance D17; the ten-day statement does not establish a deadline for that separate procedure.
For the 2026–27 academic year, Imperial states that it does not use Turnitin's AI-writing detection functionality as part of its assessment processes. Academic-integrity concerns are evaluated by staff using academic judgement and evidence. This statement does not exclude authenticity interviews or other permitted investigative methods.
Unless explicitly authorised, using generative AI to create assessed work may be treated as an academic offence such as contract cheating under Imperial's Plagiarism, Academic Integrity & Exam Offences regulations. Improper use of AI can be investigated under the University's Academic Misconduct procedures.
Unless explicitly authorised, using artificial intelligence to create assessed work may be treated as an offence such as contract cheating under Imperial's Plagiarism, Academic Integrity & Exam Offences regulations.
No hay textos anterior y nuevo comparables.
Breaches of Imperial's dAIsy Use Policy may lead to action under Academic Misconduct procedures for students and HR/disciplinary processes for staff, as well as under Information Security and Data Protection policies. Sanctions may include removal of access, grade penalties, or formal disciplinary measures.
Breaches of Imperial's dAIsy Use Policy may lead to action under Academic Misconduct procedures for students and HR/disciplinary processes for staff, as well as under Information Security and Data Protection policies. Sanctions may include removal of access, grade penalties, or formal disciplinary measures.
Students should include a statement acknowledging their use of generative AI tools for all assessed work, specifying the tool name and version, publisher, URL, a brief description of how it was used, and confirmation that the work is their own. Further requirements such as prompts used, date of output, the output obtained, and how it was modified may also be required by individual departments.
Imperial Library guidance advises students to acknowledge generative AI use in assessed work and outlines recommended elements. When dAIsy is permitted for assessed work, its Use Policy requires students to acknowledge AI use and maintain transparency. Specific requirements and formats are determined by departments, courses, or assessment briefs.
Individual departments at Imperial may allow or prohibit the use of generative AI for specific assessments. Local (team/department/faculty) instructions take precedence over university-wide guidance. Students should check their department's current policy on using and disclosing generative AI in academic work and follow their module leader's instructions.
Individual Imperial departments may allow or prohibit generative AI for specific assessments; students must follow the assessment brief and local instructions. The dAIsy Use Policy complements existing university policies and does not replace them; university policy prevails where there is a conflict.
Imperial College London has established five Generative AI Principles (aligned with Imperial Values: Respect, Collaboration, Excellence, Integrity, Innovation) to provide a foundational framework for approaches to using generative AI in teaching, learning and assessment university-wide. The principles cover promoting critical use of AI, adopting a consistent ethical approach, and building a proactive research community around AI in education.
Imperial's generative AI guidance presents three areas of principles for teaching, learning and assessment: critical use of AI, a consistent ethical approach, and a proactive research community. They are underpinned by five core Values: Respect, Collaboration, Excellence, Integrity and Innovation. The principles are a non-exhaustive foundational framework; they do not establish blanket assessment permission.
All Imperial staff and students have access to Microsoft Copilot with Commercial Data Protection when signed in using their Imperial credentials. Microsoft Copilot has no access to organizational data in the Microsoft 365 Graph. Chat results are not saved or made available to Microsoft, and data does not pass outside the organisation.
Imperial provides Microsoft Copilot access to staff and students using institutional accounts. Microsoft Copilot Chat offers enterprise data protection, and prompts and responses are not used to train foundation models. Microsoft documents that Copilot Chat prompts and responses are logged and stored in Exchange within the Microsoft 365 tenant for auditing and eDiscovery. Access to organisational information and specific retention controls depend on the Microsoft product, licence, and tenant configuration. Users should follow Imperial's current data-protection requirements. When web grounding is enabled, generated search queries can be sent to Bing, which operates separately from Microsoft 365 under different data-handling terms. This record does not establish which features are enabled in Imperial's tenant.
No hay textos anterior y nuevo comparables.
Imperial's dAIsy AI platform uses University SSO authentication with auditing. Prompts and metadata are logged for operational monitoring, and AI model providers are configured not to train on user data. Users' prompts and responses are not used to train external AI models. dAIsy is approved for use with unrestricted data within Imperial's secure infrastructure.
Imperial's dAIsy AI platform uses University SSO authentication with auditing. Prompts and metadata are logged for operational monitoring, and AI model providers are configured not to train on user data. Users' prompts and responses are not used to train external AI models. dAIsy is approved for use with unrestricted data within Imperial's secure infrastructure.
Imperial states that Turnitin's proposed July 2026 changes concerning AI-related processing of student submissions have been deferred until at least the 2027–28 academic year. The university reports no corresponding change to its Turnitin usage arrangements during 2026–27.
No hay textos anterior y nuevo comparables.
Research at Imperial that involves people, personal data, or sensitive topics may require ethics approval, a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA), and data-governance controls before using any AI tool. Researchers must verify whether their use of AI in research requires special approval, particularly when uploading private or confidential research data.
Research at Imperial that involves people, personal data, or sensitive topics may require ethics approval, a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA), and data-governance controls before using any AI tool. Researchers must verify whether their use of AI in research requires special approval, particularly when uploading private or confidential research data.
GPT in dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Imperial provides access to selected OpenAI GPT models through the institutional dAIsy platform. This does not establish access to the standalone ChatGPT service or permission to use GPT-generated content in assessed work.
Claude in dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Imperial provides access to selected Anthropic Claude models through the institutional dAIsy platform. This does not establish permission to use Claude-generated content in assessed work.
DeepSeek in dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Imperial provides access to selected DeepSeek models through the institutional dAIsy platform. This does not establish permission to use DeepSeek-generated content in assessed work.
dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Imperial provides dAIsy as its institutional multi-model generative-AI platform. Basic access is available to eligible staff and students to create Personal Agents; Developer access with shared agents is restricted to approved staff, and direct LLM API access is not currently provided. Platform access does not constitute coursework permission.
No hay textos anterior y nuevo comparables.
Users of Imperial's dAIsy platform must not upload third-party content they are not permitted to share. Reuse of AI outputs must comply with licensing and academic citation norms. When communicating externally, dAIsy outputs must not be presented as Imperial's position without approval.
Users of Imperial's dAIsy platform must not upload third-party content they are not permitted to share. Reuse of AI outputs must comply with licensing and academic citation norms. When communicating externally, dAIsy outputs must not be presented as Imperial's position without approval.
No hay textos anterior y nuevo comparables.
Users of Imperial's dAIsy AI platform must always apply critical judgment to AI outputs. Generative AI can produce inaccurate or biased outputs ('hallucinate'), omit context, or reflect training-data biases. Users remain accountable for the accuracy, legality, and appropriateness of any content they submit or share through the platform.
Users of Imperial's dAIsy AI platform must always apply critical judgment to AI outputs. Generative AI can produce inaccurate or biased outputs ('hallucinate'), omit context, or reflect training-data biases. Users remain accountable for the accuracy, legality, and appropriateness of any content they submit or share through the platform.
Registros afectados: 6 (4 añadidos)
Revisión: public-release-20260715-005Registros afectados: 6 (4 añadidos)
Reglas para herramientas de IA
GPT in dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Claude in dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
DeepSeek in dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
No hay textos anterior y nuevo comparables.
Microsoft Copilot is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
No hay textos anterior y nuevo comparables.
dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.
Registros afectados: 2 (2 añadidos)
Revisión: public-release-20260614-001Registros afectados: 2 (2 añadidos)
Reglas para herramientas de IA
Microsoft Copilot is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.