Historia rejestru

Imperial College London

Aktualizacje zweryfikowanych danych serwisu nie potwierdzają zmiany zasad uczelni.

Data publikacji rejestru nie jest datą wejścia w życie zasad uczelni.

Pasujące wersje: 4

  1. Aktualizacja strony

    Aktualizacja strony

    Wersja: v6-reading-rankings-ten-20261027
    Zobacz wersję
    Inne wpisy · Aktualizacja strony

    Aktualizacja strony

    Brak porównywalnych tekstów obu wersji.

    Nowy tekst

    Shared V6 reading layout and evidence presentation updated. University policy Claims, original evidence, held decisions and snapshot approvals remain unchanged; the institution audit remains PARTIAL.

    Otwórz historię wersji
  2. Korekta serwisu · Uzupełnienie rejestru

    Liczba objętych wpisów: 17 (Poprawiono / zmieniono: 14 · Dodano: 3)

    Wersja: imperial-20261011-r2
    Zobacz wersję

    Znaczenie tej aktualizacji

    Uporządkowany przegląd wpisu

    Liczba objętych wpisów: 17 (Poprawiono / zmieniono: 14 · Dodano: 3)

    Zasady używania narzędzi AI · Uczciwość akademicka · Pozostałe tematy: 4

    Ta wersja nie ma jeszcze niezależnie sprawdzonego podsumowania.

    To podsumowanie historyczne nie potwierdza bieżących uprawnień ani nowych zasad uczelni.

    Uczciwość akademicka · Liczba objętych wpisów: 4 (Poprawiono / zmieniono: 2 · Dodano: 2)

    Uzupełnienie rejestru

    Dodano

    Imperial's Academic Misconduct procedures govern the investigation of suspected misconduct, potential sanctions, and applicable appeal rights. Students challenging an Academic Misconduct Panel decision must submit an appeal within ten College working days of notification; the general academic-results appeal procedure (with a 15 working-day window) does not apply to misconduct decisions. Potential misconduct in postgraduate research programmes is dealt with under Ordinance D17; the ten-day statement does not establish a deadline for that separate procedure.

    Uzupełnienie rejestru

    Dodano

    For the 2026–27 academic year, Imperial states that it does not use Turnitin's AI-writing detection functionality as part of its assessment processes. Academic-integrity concerns are evaluated by staff using academic judgement and evidence. This statement does not exclude authenticity interviews or other permitted investigative methods.

    Korekta serwisu

    Zmiany tekstu wniosków serwisu
    Poprzedni tekst

    Unless explicitly authorised, using generative AI to create assessed work may be treated as an academic offence such as contract cheating under Imperial's Plagiarism, Academic Integrity & Exam Offences regulations. Improper use of AI can be investigated under the University's Academic Misconduct procedures.

    Nowy tekst

    Unless explicitly authorised, using artificial intelligence to create assessed work may be treated as an offence such as contract cheating under Imperial's Plagiarism, Academic Integrity & Exam Offences regulations.

    Korekta serwisu

    Brak porównywalnych tekstów obu wersji.

    Poprzedni tekst

    Breaches of Imperial's dAIsy Use Policy may lead to action under Academic Misconduct procedures for students and HR/disciplinary processes for staff, as well as under Information Security and Data Protection policies. Sanctions may include removal of access, grade penalties, or formal disciplinary measures.

    Nowy tekst

    Breaches of Imperial's dAIsy Use Policy may lead to action under Academic Misconduct procedures for students and HR/disciplinary processes for staff, as well as under Information Security and Data Protection policies. Sanctions may include removal of access, grade penalties, or formal disciplinary measures.

    Nauczanie · Liczba objętych wpisów: 3 (Poprawiono / zmieniono: 3)

    Korekta serwisu

    Zmiany tekstu wniosków serwisu
    Poprzedni tekst

    Students should include a statement acknowledging their use of generative AI tools for all assessed work, specifying the tool name and version, publisher, URL, a brief description of how it was used, and confirmation that the work is their own. Further requirements such as prompts used, date of output, the output obtained, and how it was modified may also be required by individual departments.

    Nowy tekst

    Imperial Library guidance advises students to acknowledge generative AI use in assessed work and outlines recommended elements. When dAIsy is permitted for assessed work, its Use Policy requires students to acknowledge AI use and maintain transparency. Specific requirements and formats are determined by departments, courses, or assessment briefs.

    Korekta serwisu

    Zmiany tekstu wniosków serwisu
    Poprzedni tekst

    Individual departments at Imperial may allow or prohibit the use of generative AI for specific assessments. Local (team/department/faculty) instructions take precedence over university-wide guidance. Students should check their department's current policy on using and disclosing generative AI in academic work and follow their module leader's instructions.

    Nowy tekst

    Individual Imperial departments may allow or prohibit generative AI for specific assessments; students must follow the assessment brief and local instructions. The dAIsy Use Policy complements existing university policies and does not replace them; university policy prevails where there is a conflict.

    Korekta serwisu

    Zmiany tekstu wniosków serwisu
    Poprzedni tekst

    Imperial College London has established five Generative AI Principles (aligned with Imperial Values: Respect, Collaboration, Excellence, Integrity, Innovation) to provide a foundational framework for approaches to using generative AI in teaching, learning and assessment university-wide. The principles cover promoting critical use of AI, adopting a consistent ethical approach, and building a proactive research community around AI in education.

    Nowy tekst

    Imperial's generative AI guidance presents three areas of principles for teaching, learning and assessment: critical use of AI, a consistent ethical approach, and a proactive research community. They are underpinned by five core Values: Respect, Collaboration, Excellence, Integrity and Innovation. The principles are a non-exhaustive foundational framework; they do not establish blanket assessment permission.

    Prywatność · Liczba objętych wpisów: 3 (Poprawiono / zmieniono: 2 · Dodano: 1)

    Korekta serwisu

    Zmiany tekstu wniosków serwisu
    Poprzedni tekst

    All Imperial staff and students have access to Microsoft Copilot with Commercial Data Protection when signed in using their Imperial credentials. Microsoft Copilot has no access to organizational data in the Microsoft 365 Graph. Chat results are not saved or made available to Microsoft, and data does not pass outside the organisation.

    Nowy tekst

    Imperial provides Microsoft Copilot access to staff and students using institutional accounts. Microsoft Copilot Chat offers enterprise data protection, and prompts and responses are not used to train foundation models. Microsoft documents that Copilot Chat prompts and responses are logged and stored in Exchange within the Microsoft 365 tenant for auditing and eDiscovery. Access to organisational information and specific retention controls depend on the Microsoft product, licence, and tenant configuration. Users should follow Imperial's current data-protection requirements. When web grounding is enabled, generated search queries can be sent to Bing, which operates separately from Microsoft 365 under different data-handling terms. This record does not establish which features are enabled in Imperial's tenant.

    Korekta serwisu

    Brak porównywalnych tekstów obu wersji.

    Poprzedni tekst

    Imperial's dAIsy AI platform uses University SSO authentication with auditing. Prompts and metadata are logged for operational monitoring, and AI model providers are configured not to train on user data. Users' prompts and responses are not used to train external AI models. dAIsy is approved for use with unrestricted data within Imperial's secure infrastructure.

    Nowy tekst

    Imperial's dAIsy AI platform uses University SSO authentication with auditing. Prompts and metadata are logged for operational monitoring, and AI model providers are configured not to train on user data. Users' prompts and responses are not used to train external AI models. dAIsy is approved for use with unrestricted data within Imperial's secure infrastructure.

    Uzupełnienie rejestru

    Dodano

    Imperial states that Turnitin's proposed July 2026 changes concerning AI-related processing of student submissions have been deferred until at least the 2027–28 academic year. The university reports no corresponding change to its Turnitin usage arrangements during 2026–27.

    Badania · Liczba objętych wpisów: 1 (Poprawiono / zmieniono: 1)

    Korekta serwisu

    Brak porównywalnych tekstów obu wersji.

    Poprzedni tekst

    Research at Imperial that involves people, personal data, or sensitive topics may require ethics approval, a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA), and data-governance controls before using any AI tool. Researchers must verify whether their use of AI in research requires special approval, particularly when uploading private or confidential research data.

    Nowy tekst

    Research at Imperial that involves people, personal data, or sensitive topics may require ethics approval, a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA), and data-governance controls before using any AI tool. Researchers must verify whether their use of AI in research requires special approval, particularly when uploading private or confidential research data.

    Zasady używania narzędzi AI · Liczba objętych wpisów: 4 (Poprawiono / zmieniono: 4)

    Korekta serwisu

    Zmiany tekstu wniosków serwisu
    Poprzedni tekst

    GPT in dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Nowy tekst

    Imperial provides access to selected OpenAI GPT models through the institutional dAIsy platform. This does not establish access to the standalone ChatGPT service or permission to use GPT-generated content in assessed work.

    Korekta serwisu

    Zmiany tekstu wniosków serwisu
    Poprzedni tekst

    Claude in dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Nowy tekst

    Imperial provides access to selected Anthropic Claude models through the institutional dAIsy platform. This does not establish permission to use Claude-generated content in assessed work.

    Korekta serwisu

    Zmiany tekstu wniosków serwisu
    Poprzedni tekst

    DeepSeek in dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Nowy tekst

    Imperial provides access to selected DeepSeek models through the institutional dAIsy platform. This does not establish permission to use DeepSeek-generated content in assessed work.

    Korekta serwisu

    Zmiany tekstu wniosków serwisu
    Poprzedni tekst

    dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Nowy tekst

    Imperial provides dAIsy as its institutional multi-model generative-AI platform. Basic access is available to eligible staff and students to create Personal Agents; Developer access with shared agents is restricted to approved staff, and direct LLM API access is not currently provided. Platform access does not constitute coursework permission.

    Inne wpisy · Liczba objętych wpisów: 2 (Poprawiono / zmieniono: 2)

    Korekta serwisu

    Brak porównywalnych tekstów obu wersji.

    Poprzedni tekst

    Users of Imperial's dAIsy platform must not upload third-party content they are not permitted to share. Reuse of AI outputs must comply with licensing and academic citation norms. When communicating externally, dAIsy outputs must not be presented as Imperial's position without approval.

    Nowy tekst

    Users of Imperial's dAIsy platform must not upload third-party content they are not permitted to share. Reuse of AI outputs must comply with licensing and academic citation norms. When communicating externally, dAIsy outputs must not be presented as Imperial's position without approval.

    Korekta serwisu

    Brak porównywalnych tekstów obu wersji.

    Poprzedni tekst

    Users of Imperial's dAIsy AI platform must always apply critical judgment to AI outputs. Generative AI can produce inaccurate or biased outputs ('hallucinate'), omit context, or reflect training-data biases. Users remain accountable for the accuracy, legality, and appropriateness of any content they submit or share through the platform.

    Nowy tekst

    Users of Imperial's dAIsy AI platform must always apply critical judgment to AI outputs. Generative AI can produce inaccurate or biased outputs ('hallucinate'), omit context, or reflect training-data biases. Users remain accountable for the accuracy, legality, and appropriateness of any content they submit or share through the platform.

    Otwórz historię wersji
  3. Uzupełnienie rejestru · Historia · przyczyna niesklasyfikowana

    Liczba objętych wpisów: 6 (Dodano: 4)

    Wersja: public-release-20260715-005
    Zobacz wersję

    Znaczenie tej aktualizacji

    Uporządkowany przegląd wpisu

    Liczba objętych wpisów: 6 (Dodano: 4)

    Zasady używania narzędzi AI

    Ta wersja nie ma jeszcze niezależnie sprawdzonego podsumowania.

    To podsumowanie historyczne nie potwierdza bieżących uprawnień ani nowych zasad uczelni.

    Zasady używania narzędzi AI · Liczba objętych wpisów: 6 (Dodano: 4)

    Uzupełnienie rejestru

    Dodano

    GPT in dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Uzupełnienie rejestru

    Dodano

    Claude in dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Uzupełnienie rejestru

    Dodano

    DeepSeek in dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Uzupełnienie rejestru

    Dodano

    dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Historia · przyczyna niesklasyfikowana

    Brak porównywalnych tekstów obu wersji.

    Poprzedni tekst

    Microsoft Copilot is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    Historia · przyczyna niesklasyfikowana

    Brak porównywalnych tekstów obu wersji.

    Poprzedni tekst

    dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

    Otwórz historię wersji
  4. Uzupełnienie rejestru

    Liczba objętych wpisów: 2 (Dodano: 2)

    Wersja: public-release-20260614-001
    Zobacz wersję

    Znaczenie tej aktualizacji

    Uporządkowany przegląd wpisu

    Liczba objętych wpisów: 2 (Dodano: 2)

    Zasady używania narzędzi AI

    Ta wersja nie ma jeszcze niezależnie sprawdzonego podsumowania.

    To podsumowanie historyczne nie potwierdza bieżących uprawnień ani nowych zasad uczelni.

    Zasady używania narzędzi AI · Liczba objętych wpisów: 2 (Dodano: 2)

    Uzupełnienie rejestru

    Dodano

    Microsoft Copilot is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    Uzupełnienie rejestru

    Dodano

    dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

    Otwórz historię wersji

Niepodane powody historyczne pozostają niesklasyfikowane.

Dowody lub klasyfikacja historyczna są niepełne. Zobacz historię.

Strona uczelniHistoria JSON