Change log

Utrecht University

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Utrecht University currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Utrecht University current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+12-0
11 # Utrecht University AI policy record
2+source_status: Utrecht University publishes an institutional AI Policy that is endorsed by the Executive Board and University Council and frames Responsible AI across AI systems and tools, not only generative AI.
3+Evidence (en, d3db7180d3d8): This institutional AI policy is being endorsed by the Executive Board and the University Council and will be shaped based on legal frameworks, UU frameworks and our academic values. At UU we use the term Responsible AI by which we mean the ethical and responsible application of AI systems and tools. This is not limited to Generative AI but applies to all forms of AI.
4+security_review: For employees, Utrecht University says it is not permitted to create an AI-tool account using a UU email address or SolisID unless the AI system or tool is university supplied and considered safe.
5+Evidence (en, 05462c04bde3): It is not permitted to create an AI-tool account using your UU email address or SolisID unless the AI system or tool is supplied by the university and considered safe.
6+ai_tool_treatment: Utrecht University uses an AI index for students as a five-level scale for how AI may be used, with teachers able to choose levels for a course or specific assignments.
7+Evidence (en, 40924ad17b01): In education, we are working with the AI index. That is a 5-level scale indicating to what extent or how you may use generative AI or, for example, AI for data analysis etc. The teacher can choose from the 5 levels of AI use within the course as a whole, but can also choose to select different levels for specific assignments.
8+privacy: Utrecht University tells students not to use a UU student email address for AI-tool verification or account creation and notes that teachers cannot force students to create an AI-tool account while UU lacks secure AI tools.
9+Evidence (en, f51ecf39e997): Do not enter your UU student email-address for verification purposes or to create an account. Be aware that free actually means that you are paying with your data. A teacher cannot force you to create an account in an AI tool because we cannot yet offer secure AI tools from the UU.
10+research: Utrecht University's researcher guidance says personal or sensitive data should not be used as GenAI input unless the user is certain data protection law is respected.
11+Evidence (en, 5b6e9fe5ccc2): Do not use any personal or sensitive data as input when using GenAI tools, unless you are certain that the data protection law is respected. Many risks pertaining to GenAI are not immediately visible. In many cases, it is necessary to assess the impact of your use of GenAI on data protection and privacy.
12+teaching: Utrecht University's teacher AI Policy guidance says AI use in education must be ethical and legally compliant while the university retains human-in-the-loop freedom of action.
13+Evidence (en, 70586afe8393): However, the use of AI systems and tools must be ethical and legally compliant, while we as a university and as humans-in-the-loop retain our own freedom of action. We want to exploit opportunities of AI and mitigate the risks.

Claim changes

6 claim records

source_status

Utrecht University publishes an institutional AI Policy that is endorsed by the Executive Board and University Council and frames Responsible AI across AI systems and tools, not only generative AI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

For employees, Utrecht University says it is not permitted to create an AI-tool account using a UU email address or SolisID unless the AI system or tool is university supplied and considered safe.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

Utrecht University uses an AI index for students as a five-level scale for how AI may be used, with teachers able to choose levels for a course or specific assignments.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

Utrecht University tells students not to use a UU student email address for AI-tool verification or account creation and notes that teachers cannot force students to create an AI-tool account while UU lacks secure AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

research

Utrecht University's researcher guidance says personal or sensitive data should not be used as GenAI input unless the user is certain data protection law is respected.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Utrecht University's teacher AI Policy guidance says AI use in education must be ethical and legally compliant while the university retains human-in-the-loop freedom of action.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

6 source attributions