ai_tool_treatment
The Faculty of Engineering guide says AI tool use should be transparent and recognized, including explaining permitted uses and how to declare tool use in submitted work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Universidad de la República (Udelar)
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Universidad de la República (Udelar) currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 18, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for Universidad de la República (Udelar). Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Universidad de la República (Udelar) combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+10-0
11 # Universidad de la República (Udelar) AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: The Faculty of Engineering guide says AI tool use should be transparent and recognized, including explaining permitted uses and how to declare tool use in submitted work.
3+Evidence (es, 47a1121ee596): Transparencia: El uso de herramientas de IA debe ser transparente y debidamente reconocido. Entre las medidas para aumentar la transparencia se encuentran: Discutir en clase el uso de la IA en la unidad curricular. No ignorar la existencia de estas herramientas ni su posible uso por parte de los estudiantes. Explicar qué usos están permitidos y cómo declarar el uso de la herramienta en los trabajos entregables.
4+academic_integrity: The Faculty of Engineering guide says significant AI-contributed content should be declared, and presenting AI-generated content as one's own may be treated as a violation under the faculty's current regulations.
5+Evidence (es, 47a1121ee596): Siempre que se utilicen herramientas de IA que aporten contenido significativo, se debe declarar la herramienta utilizada y cómo se integró la IA en el trabajo. Atribuirse la autoría de contenido generado por herramientas de IA podrá considerarse una falta a las reglamentaciones vigentes de la Facultad de Ingeniería, con las implicaciones y sanciones que ello conlleva, según la gravedad.
6+source_status: Udelar's Faculty of Engineering formally approved a faculty-scoped guide for ethical and critical AI use in its curricular units.
7+Evidence (es, 199ca16e2465): Posteriormente, el Consejo de la Facultad de Ingeniería, en sesión ordinaria del 10 de febrero de 2026, aprobó formalmente la Guía para el Uso Ético y Crítico de Inteligencia Artificial en las Unidades Curriculares de Fing.
8+teaching: The Faculty of Engineering guide provides non-prescriptive categories for reduced, moderate, and extensive AI use in curricular units and assessments.
9+Evidence (es, 47a1121ee596): A continuación, se ofrece una posible clasificación de las UC y el uso de la IA recomendado para cada categoría. El objetivo es proporcionar un marco de referencia al que adaptarse para decidir los criterios apropiados para cada UC. ... esta clasificación es orientativa y no prescriptiva: cada equipo docente puede ajustar el nivel de integración de IA según los objetivos específicos de su curso o de cada evaluación dentro de un mismo curso.
10+teaching: The Faculty of Engineering guide warns that AI-detection tools have very limited effectiveness and identifies manual review and technical interviews as effective methods for checking understanding and authorship.
11+Evidence (es, 47a1121ee596): Mecanismos de supervisión: Las herramientas de detección de uso de IA tienen una efectividad muy limitada. ... La revisión manual y las entrevistas técnicas (defensas) son métodos eficaces para evaluar la comprensión y la autoría de los trabajos presentados por estudiantes.
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
5 claim records
academic_integrity
The Faculty of Engineering guide says significant AI-contributed content should be declared, and presenting AI-generated content as one's own may be treated as a violation under the faculty's current regulations.
Review: Agent reviewed
source_status
Udelar's Faculty of Engineering formally approved a faculty-scoped guide for ethical and critical AI use in its curricular units.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
The Faculty of Engineering guide provides non-prescriptive categories for reduced, moderate, and extensive AI use in curricular units and assessments.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
The Faculty of Engineering guide warns that AI-detection tools have very limited effectiveness and identifies manual review and technical interviews as effective methods for checking understanding and authorship.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
2 source attributions
Guía para el uso ético y crítico de inteligencia artificial en las unidades curriculares de Facultad de Ingeniería
official_pdf Tracker checked at May 18, 2026, 12:39 AM
La Facultad de Ingeniería aprobó su "Guía para el uso ético y crítico de Inteligencia Artificial"
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 18, 2026, 12:40 AM