Change log

Philipps-Universität Marburg

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Philipps-Universität Marburg currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 20, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Philipps-Universität Marburg current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+8-0
11 # Philipps-Universität Marburg AI policy record
2+privacy: The HRZ AI services page says the university offers generative AI services via GWDG KI-Cloud and lists usage rules including no prompt/file input of personal, confidential, or security-relevant data and transparent disclosure when the service is used.
3+Evidence (de, d9589821d83c): Geben Sie niemals personenbezogene, vertrauliche oder sicherheitsrelevante Daten über den Prompt ein bzw. stellen sie diese niemals dem genKI-Modell über Dateien zur Verfügung. ... Sollte der Dienst genutzt werden, muss dies transparent angegeben werden.
4+teaching: Philipps-Universität Marburg's central teaching-and-AI orientation says the university does not prohibit generative AI and frames the guidance around exploring productive use in teaching and teaching organization.
5+Evidence (de, 000c1200bd24): Die UMR verbietet nicht den Einsatz generativer KI. Dazu gehören sprachbasierte KI-Anwendungen (z.B. ChatGPT) ebenso wie bildgenerierende KI-Anwendungen (z.B. DALL-E, Midjourney).
6+academic_integrity: The central teaching-and-AI orientation recommends that, for written work, AI-generated text parts be marked as such as a matter of good scientific practice.
7+Evidence (de, 000c1200bd24): Gute wissenschaftliche Praxis erfordert, dass KI-generierte Textteile als solche gekennzeichnet werden.
8+academic_integrity: A Fachbereich 03 Empirische Kulturwissenschaft page states that information taken directly or indirectly from AI tools must be marked, otherwise it is a deception attempt; this claim is limited to that page's department-scoped guidance.
9+Evidence (de, 32fb0ea6b92d): In jedem Fall müssen Informationen, die direkt oder sinngemäß aus einem solchen Tool stammen, gekennzeichnet werden, andernfalls handelt es sich hierbei um einen Täuschungsversuch.

Claim changes

4 claim records

academic_integrity

A Fachbereich 03 Empirische Kulturwissenschaft page states that information taken directly or indirectly from AI tools must be marked, otherwise it is a deception attempt; this claim is limited to that page's department-scoped guidance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagesde

privacy

The HRZ AI services page says the university offers generative AI services via GWDG KI-Cloud and lists usage rules including no prompt/file input of personal, confidential, or security-relevant data and transparent disclosure when the service is used.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesde

academic_integrity

The central teaching-and-AI orientation recommends that, for written work, AI-generated text parts be marked as such as a matter of good scientific practice.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesde

teaching

Philipps-Universität Marburg's central teaching-and-AI orientation says the university does not prohibit generative AI and frames the guidance around exploring productive use in teaching and teaching organization.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesde

Source snapshots

3 source attributions