privacy
NTNU's guideline cautions that content entered into GAI may be recorded and used for training, and advises users not to input unpublished documents or personal information unless necessary.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU)
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU) currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Claim/evidence diff preview
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU) current policy evidence
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
+10-0
11 # National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU) AI policy record
2+privacy: NTNU's guideline cautions that content entered into GAI may be recorded and used for training, and advises users not to input unpublished documents or personal information unless necessary.
3+Evidence (zh-Hant, dc340ab79709): 由於輸入至 GAI 的內容可能會被紀錄並加以學習應用，故使用時須謹慎確認，非必要時請勿將未公開文件、個人訊息等資料輸入至對話框內。
4+academic_integrity: NTNU's guideline says users should appropriately disclose GAI use in reports, academic works, music, art, or image creation, including the tool name, use method, and AI role.
5+Evidence (zh-Hant, dc340ab79709): 凡於報告撰寫、學術著作、音樂、畫作或圖片創作等過程中使用 GAI 者，應進行適當之自我揭露，清楚說明人工智慧工具之使用情形，包括使用之工具名稱、使用方式及其在作品中所扮演之角色，並加以標註或說明。
6+ai_tool_treatment: NTNU's central generative-AI learning guideline frames GAI as an assistive tool for instructors, students, and administrative staff, while warning users to verify accuracy and avoid overreliance.
7+Evidence (zh-Hant, dc340ab79709): 若能善用 GAI，將大幅提升學習和工作效率，提供更高品質的教學研究內容，為生活帶來便利。但作為工具，亦有其限制，使用者依然必須針對正確性作嚴謹的把關確認，不宜過度依賴。
8+teaching: For assessment design, NTNU's guideline advises instructors to consider new AI-suited standards and methods and to reach consensus with students when traditional assessments can be quickly completed or replaced by GAI.
9+Evidence (zh-Hant, dc340ab79709): 若傳統評量方式可被 GAI 快速完成或取代時，建議教師可思考新的、更符合運用 AI 學習的評量標準及方式，並與學生達成運用 AI 之共識。
10+source_status: Discovery found a central NTNU reference guideline for generative-AI learning applications, but not a separate formal binding university-wide AI policy; the central page encourages academic units to create discipline-specific GAI guidelines.
11+Evidence (zh-Hant, dc340ab79709): 鼓勵各教學單位（院、系所）依學門特性與課程需求，訂定專屬之 AI 使用指引，內容可涵蓋學術誠信、使用規範、自我揭露及倫理原則等事項。
Claim changes
5 claim records
academic_integrity
NTNU's guideline says users should appropriately disclose GAI use in reports, academic works, music, art, or image creation, including the tool name, use method, and AI role.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
NTNU's central generative-AI learning guideline frames GAI as an assistive tool for instructors, students, and administrative staff, while warning users to verify accuracy and avoid overreliance.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
For assessment design, NTNU's guideline advises instructors to consider new AI-suited standards and methods and to reach consensus with students when traditional assessments can be quickly completed or replaced by GAI.
Review: Agent reviewed
source_status
Discovery found a central NTNU reference guideline for generative-AI learning applications, but not a separate formal binding university-wide AI policy; the central page encourages academic units to create discipline-specific GAI guidelines.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
1 source attribution
國立臺灣師範大學 – 生成式AI之學習應用及參考指引
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026