Change log

National Chengchi University

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

National Chengchi University currently has 3 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 17, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

National Chengchi University current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+6-0
11 # National Chengchi University AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: For students, NCCU's generative AI principles say generative AI tools may be used within instructor rules and academic ethics, and that report content produced with generative tools should be rigorously cited to meet academic ethics requirements.
3+Evidence (zh-Hant, 69f740fbf2cb): 學生使用生成式 AI 工具,應遵守學術誠信的原則,不應出現抄襲及作弊之行為,且遵守課程教師之規定。……在符合授課教師規定並符合學術倫理之規範下,得妥善運用生成式人工智慧工具提升學習效率及成效,並完成各課程學習成果產出。……利用生成工具產出報告相關內容時,應嚴謹標註出處,符合學術倫理要求。
4+privacy: NCCU's generative AI principles tell students to avoid involving personal privacy data when using generative tools, and tell administrative staff not to provide confidential official content, personal privacy information, or non-public unit information to generative AI tools.
5+Evidence (zh-Hant, 725ddaa4d79b): 避免運用生成工具時涉及使用個人隱私資料,或採用具有偏見或歧視之字眼及內容。……機密公務內容、個人隱私資訊及未經單位同意公開之資訊禁止提供給生成式人工智慧工具,亦不得向生成式AI詢問可能涉及機密業務或個人資料之問題。
6+teaching: National Chengchi University's generative AI principles advise instructors to state course-specific generative AI tool rules in the syllabus, with reference options including full permission, conditional permission, prohibition with a management mechanism, or no AI use in the course.
7+Evidence (zh-Hant, 725ddaa4d79b): 為避免師生對於「可否使用生成式 AI 工具」的態度不一致,導致產生評分爭議,請教師在教學大綱中敘明生成式 AI 工具使用規定。假若教師對相關規定毫無頭緒,可以參考並利用目前各校常用參考選項制定:完全開放使用、有條件開放使用(敘明規定)、禁止使用(敘明管理機制)、本課程無涉及 AI 使用。

Claim changes

3 claim records

academic_integrity

For students, NCCU's generative AI principles say generative AI tools may be used within instructor rules and academic ethics, and that report content produced with generative tools should be rigorously cited to meet academic ethics requirements.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languageszh-Hant

privacy

NCCU's generative AI principles tell students to avoid involving personal privacy data when using generative tools, and tell administrative staff not to provide confidential official content, personal privacy information, or non-public unit information to generative AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languageszh-Hant

teaching

National Chengchi University's generative AI principles advise instructors to state course-specific generative AI tool rules in the syllabus, with reference options including full permission, conditional permission, prohibition with a management mechanism, or no AI use in the course.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languageszh-Hant

Source snapshots

2 source attributions