University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

API docsGitHub repo

Change log

Linköping University

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Claims3Sources3
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Linköping University currently has 3 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Linköping University current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+6-0
11 # Linköping University AI policy record
2+teaching: For the TDDC93/TDDC88/725G64 courses, the course policy says use of generative AI tools is permitted in 2025, while students remain responsible for submitted content.
3+Evidence (en, 6d2f2e32c2fc): In 2025, the use of generative AI tools is permitted, but students take full responsibility for all the content that they submit.
4+teaching: Linköping University announced a strategic decision to implement an action plan for AI-ready education, including programme review, teacher skills development, AI ambassadors, and examination-design review for unauthorized AI use.
5+Evidence (en, d30f0a7403dd): Linköping University has made a strategic decision to implement an action plan for AI-ready education. AI here refers to generative artificial intelligence.
6+academic_integrity: An official Studieinfo syllabus page states that Linköping University has produced a guide for teachers and students on generative AI in education, and tells students that clarity about where and how generative AI has been used is important.
7+Evidence (en, b2a1d130f5d1): Linköping University has also produced a guide for teachers and students' use of generative AI in education (Dnr LiU-2023-02660). As a student, you are always expected to gain knowledge of what applies to each course (including the degree project). In general, clarity to where and how generative AI has been used is important.

Claim changes

3 claim records

teaching

For the TDDC93/TDDC88/725G64 courses, the course policy says use of generative AI tools is permitted in 2025, while students remain responsible for submitted content.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Linköping University announced a strategic decision to implement an action plan for AI-ready education, including programme review, teacher skills development, AI ambassadors, and examination-design review for unauthorized AI use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence2Languagesen

academic_integrity

An official Studieinfo syllabus page states that Linköping University has produced a guide for teachers and students on generative AI in education, and tells students that clarity about where and how generative AI has been used is important.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

3 source attributions