Policy presence
Linköping University has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Linköping, Sweden
Linköping University has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Linköping University has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Linköping University has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Linköping University has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.
Linköping University has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Teaching
Normalized value: course_specific_generative_ai_permitted_with_student_responsibility
Original evidence
Evidence 1In 2025, the use of generative AI tools is permitted, but students take full responsibility for all the content that they submit.
Teaching
Normalized value: ai_ready_education_action_plan_announced
Original evidence
Evidence 1Linköping University has made a strategic decision to implement an action plan for AI-ready education. AI here refers to generative artificial intelligence.
Original evidence
Evidence 2The action plan also includes assignments to adapt programme and course syllabi so that the AI perspective is integrated at all levels, as well to review how examinations are designed to prevent misconduct or deception involving the unauthorised use of AI.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: generative_ai_use_clarity_expected
Original evidence
Evidence 1Linköping University has also produced a guide for teachers and students' use of generative AI in education (Dnr LiU-2023-02660). As a student, you are always expected to gain knowledge of what applies to each course (including the degree project). In general, clarity to where and how generative AI has been used is important.
0 machine or needs-review claim
3 source attribution
liu.se
ida.liu.se
studieinfo.liu.se