Linköping, Sweden

Linköping University

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage3 reviewedEvidence-backed claims3Reviewed3Candidate0Official sources3Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/linkoping-university.json

Policy profile

Coverage score60/100Coverage labelmoderate public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence75%

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Approved tools

No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Named AI services

No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Teaching

For the TDDC93/TDDC88/725G64 courses, the course policy says use of generative AI tools is permitted in 2025, while students remain responsible for submitted content.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: course_specific_generative_ai_permitted_with_student_responsibility

Original evidence

Evidence 1
In 2025, the use of generative AI tools is permitted, but students take full responsibility for all the content that they submit.

Teaching

Linköping University announced a strategic decision to implement an action plan for AI-ready education, including programme review, teacher skills development, AI ambassadors, and examination-design review for unauthorized AI use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: ai_ready_education_action_plan_announced

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Linköping University has made a strategic decision to implement an action plan for AI-ready education. AI here refers to generative artificial intelligence.

Original evidence

Evidence 2
The action plan also includes assignments to adapt programme and course syllabi so that the AI perspective is integrated at all levels, as well to review how examinations are designed to prevent misconduct or deception involving the unauthorised use of AI.

Academic Integrity

An official Studieinfo syllabus page states that Linköping University has produced a guide for teachers and students on generative AI in education, and tells students that clarity about where and how generative AI has been used is important.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: generative_ai_use_clarity_expected

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Linköping University has also produced a guide for teachers and students' use of generative AI in education (Dnr LiU-2023-02660). As a student, you are always expected to gain knowledge of what applies to each course (including the degree project). In general, clarity to where and how generative AI has been used is important.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

3 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities