Policy presence
Linköping University has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Linköping, Sweden
Linköping University
Linköping University is listed as QS 2026 rank =310. Linköping University has 3 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Linköping University is listed as QS 2026 rank =310. Linköping University has 3 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Linköping University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 3 source-backed claims, including 3 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/linkoping-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 90%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
Linköping University has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Exams
Linköping University has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Privacy and data entry
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Academic integrity
Linköping University has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Approved tools
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Named AI services
No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.
Teaching guidance
Linköping University has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Teaching
For the TDDC93/TDDC88/725G64 courses, the course policy says use of generative AI tools is permitted in 2025, while students remain responsible for submitted content.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: course_specific_generative_ai_permitted_with_student_responsibility
Original evidence
Evidence 1In 2025, the use of generative AI tools is permitted, but students take full responsibility for all the content that they submit.
Teaching
Linköping University announced a strategic decision to implement an action plan for AI-ready education, including programme review, teacher skills development, AI ambassadors, and examination-design review for unauthorized AI use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_ready_education_action_plan_announced
Original evidence
Evidence 1Linköping University has made a strategic decision to implement an action plan for AI-ready education. AI here refers to generative artificial intelligence.
Original evidence
Evidence 2The action plan also includes assignments to adapt programme and course syllabi so that the AI perspective is integrated at all levels, as well to review how examinations are designed to prevent misconduct or deception involving the unauthorised use of AI.
Academic Integrity
An official Studieinfo syllabus page states that Linköping University has produced a guide for teachers and students on generative AI in education, and tells students that clarity about where and how generative AI has been used is important.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: generative_ai_use_clarity_expected
Original evidence
Evidence 1Linköping University has also produced a guide for teachers and students' use of generative AI in education (Dnr LiU-2023-02660). As a student, you are always expected to gain knowledge of what applies to each course (including the degree project). In general, clarity to where and how generative AI has been used is important.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
3 source attribution
Linköping University to AI-proof its study programmes and courses
liu.se
Policy for generative AI
ida.liu.se
TSKS18 Generative AI for Data Compression and Transmission
studieinfo.liu.se
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.