source_status
Chung-Ang University has an official Korean-language generative AI guidance page, established on 2023-04-20 and revised on 2024-04-09, administered by Library & Academic Information Services.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Chung-Ang University (CAU)
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Chung-Ang University (CAU) currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Claim/evidence diff preview
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
Chung-Ang University (CAU) current policy evidence
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
+10-0
11 # Chung-Ang University (CAU) AI policy record
2+source_status: Chung-Ang University has an official Korean-language generative AI guidance page, established on 2023-04-20 and revised on 2024-04-09, administered by Library & Academic Information Services.
3+Evidence (ko, 4e29f8f011cc): 2023. 4. 20 제정; 2024. 4. 9 개정; 주무부서 : 학술정보원. ChatGPT 등 생성형 인공지능(Generative AI) 확산에 신속하게 대응하고, 대학 교육에서 교수 및 학습 윤리를 준수하며 생성형 AI를 활용하기 위한 가이드라인을 제시한다.
4+teaching: CAU recommends that instructors choose one of three generative AI use options and state the selected approach in the syllabus.
5+Evidence (ko, 4e29f8f011cc): 교수자는 생성형 AI 활용과 관련하여 다음 3가지 옵션 중 하나를 선택하여 강의계획서에 관련 내용을 명시하도록 권고한다.
6+ai_tool_treatment: CAU's guidance frames generative AI course use as instructor-selected options: complete ban, use with prior instructor approval or citation, or full permission.
7+Evidence (ko, 4e29f8f011cc): 옵션 1) 생성형 AI 사용금지 ... 옵션 2) 교수자의 사전 승인 또는 출처 표기 후 생성형 AI 사용 가능 ... 옵션 3) 자유롭게 생성형 AI 사용 가능
8+academic_integrity: CAU's guidance says generative AI use can be considered academic misconduct when used in a class where AI is completely banned or when students fail to follow syllabus or instructor guidance.
9+Evidence (ko, 4e29f8f011cc): 이 옵션을 선택할 경우, 학습자가 수업활동이나 과제 등을 수행하는 데 생성형 AI를 사용할 시 부정행위로 간주한다. ... 강의계획서에 명시된 지침 또는 교수자가 별도 제시한 지침을 준수하지 않거나 생성형 AI를 부적절하게 사용한 것으로 판단될 시, 부정행위로 간주될 수 있음을 인지한다.
10+academic_integrity: CAU's student guidance says students are responsible for the integrity of outputs produced with generative AI and should verify the accuracy of those outputs.
11+Evidence (ko, 4e29f8f011cc): 생성형 AI를 이용한 결과물의 진실성에 대한 책임은 학습자에게 있음을 인지한다. 생성형 AI를 활용한 결과물에 대해서 사실여부를 확인하는 절차를 거친다.
Claim changes
5 claim records
teaching
CAU recommends that instructors choose one of three generative AI use options and state the selected approach in the syllabus.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
CAU's guidance frames generative AI course use as instructor-selected options: complete ban, use with prior instructor approval or citation, or full permission.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
CAU's guidance says generative AI use can be considered academic misconduct when used in a class where AI is completely banned or when students fail to follow syllabus or instructor guidance.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
CAU's student guidance says students are responsible for the integrity of outputs produced with generative AI and should verify the accuracy of those outputs.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
1 source attribution
생성형 AI 규제 및 가이드라인 - 중앙대학교 생성형 AI 활용 안내 사이트
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026