11 # China Medical University AI policy record
2+privacy: China Medical University's Academic Affairs guidance cautions teachers and students to pay attention to privacy and information security and avoid entering personal or other people's private information into generative AI tools.
3+Evidence (zh-Hant, d21348b87fb3): 將「生成式AI」用於教學或學習時,師生應留意個人隱私與資訊安全,避免在「生成式AI」中輸入自己或他人之隱私資訊,以降低個人資訊外洩的風險。
4+teaching: China Medical University's Academic Affairs generative AI teaching guidance asks instructors to communicate with students about course-specific ways and limits for using generative AI.
5+Evidence (zh-Hant, d21348b87fb3): 明確使用原則:教師應與學生溝通課程使用「生成式AI」的方式和限制,確定使用的範疇、場景和目的,以避免爭議。
6+academic_integrity: China Medical University's Academic Affairs guidance tells teachers and students to consider academic-ethics concerns before using generative AI and to avoid plagiarism and copyright violations in assignments, exams, and research papers.
7+Evidence (zh-Hant, d21348b87fb3): 師生使用任何「生成式AI」工具前,應考量是否有違反學術倫理的疑慮。學術誠信是學習評量的基礎,所有作業、考試、研究論文必須遵守學倫理規範,勿抄襲,避免觸犯著作權法。
8+research: China Medical University's R&D reference guidance frames generative AI as a research-assistance tool and says researchers should verify AI-generated content, understand related policies, disclose use where required, and remain responsible for research outputs.
9+Evidence (zh-Hant, f6be8ca5f413): 研究者在使用生成式AI時,應將其定位為輔助工具,切勿過度依賴或全然接受其產出的內容...研究者必須對AI生成的論述抱持審慎態度,務必親自查核相關資訊的正確性、可靠性與時效性。
10+source_status: Official China Medical University sources include public generative-AI guidance from Academic Affairs, Research and Development, and the Teacher Development Center; these sources support staged AI-policy extraction but should be read as guidance/context unless the source itself states a binding rule.
11+Evidence (zh-Hant, fe2f25bd899c): 鼓勵教師將其視為精進教學的契機,因應新工具的發展適時調整課程規劃...並在應用AI 工具以提升教學成效的同時,確保學術誠信與法律合規性;學生端也應瞭解 AI 工具之使用限制。