Change log

Washington University in St. Louis

Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Washington University in St. Louis currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.

No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.

Claim changes

8 claim records

privacy

WashU IT guidance says users should not enter Washington University or secure data, including deidentified healthcare data, into publicly accessible non-protected AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence98%Evidence1Languagesen-US

academic_integrity

WashU student-facing AI guidance tells students to check the instructor and syllabus about whether and how AI tools may be used for classwork, and says that if no explicit policy is outlined, it is better to assume AI use is banned.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence1Languagesen-US

academic_integrity

WashU CTL student guidance says students should not represent AI-tool output as their own work and should cite AI contributions when using AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence1Languagesen-US

procurement

WashU IT AI purchasing guidance says an Office of Information Security Vendor Security Review is required when an AI tool has not yet been approved and the user intends to use or purchase it.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence1Languagesen-US

ai_tool_treatment

WashU identifies specific secure AI tools as reviewed and approved for use with sensitive information, including HIPAA- or FERPA-covered data.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen-US

teaching

WashU CTL course-policy guidance presents multiple possible GenAI policy categories for instructors, including allowed without restriction, allowed with citations, partially restricted, and completely restricted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen-US

security_review

WashU IT's DeepSeek advisory says DeepSeek is not safe for use with university non-public information.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen-US

source_status

The WashU+AI hub tells students that responsible generative-AI use includes reviewing course expectations for authorized use and seeking clarification from instructors before using generative AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen-US

Source snapshots

5 source attributions

Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) - Information Technology

official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 3:21 AM

Snapshot hash
5b8a9f00cc8755397b44997bf5453ed161a2848fb6be6c41b2c538b600ec200e

Welcome to WashU Artificial Intelligence - Artificial Intelligence

official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 3:21 AM

Snapshot hash
4911c4715a4e36f85fbb8f983a1685a2bb68c745e410f990f1ac9948e54d5c0d