security_review
UC Davis Health says users should consult their supervisor and the UC Davis Health Analytics Oversight Committee before using a generative AI tool.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
University of California, Davis
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
University of California, Davis currently has 12 source-backed claim records and 8 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 23, 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 1 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
University of California, Davis release diff
Comparing public-release-20260526-001 to public-release-20260526-003.
+3-0
11 # University of California, Davis AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+other: UC Davis Health warns that even approved generative AI tools may produce inaccurate or biased outputs.
5+Evidence (en, df8e22c388a1): Even with approved tools, you should be careful about the information you provide and the output you receive, as generative AI may not be accurate and may reflect biases.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T18:20:00.000Z
Claim changes
12 claim records
other
UC Davis Health warns that even approved generative AI tools may produce inaccurate or biased outputs.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
The UC Davis School of Medicine policy says medical students are not permitted to use external generative AI tools for patient care documentation except as allowed under UC Davis Health policy, and PHI must not be entered into a generative AI tool outside a secure institutionally supported system.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
The UC Davis School of Medicine policy says medical students may not use generative AI to directly author submitted assignments or generate answers for closed-book assessments unless faculty or course leadership gives written permission.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
UC Davis Health guidance says generative AI tools should not be used with patient information or other sensitive data unless the tool is specifically approved by UC Davis Health.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
UC Davis Center for Educational Effectiveness teaching guidance advises instructors to have explicit, transparent, and consistent AI policies and to talk with students about how, when, and why they can use generative AI tools in a course.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
UC Davis IET states that Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is available at no additional cost to UC Davis and UC Davis Health students, faculty, and staff, but sensitive data should not be uploaded without a Vendor Risk Assessment.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
The UC Davis Aggie AI tools page lists multiple AI tools available through UC Davis, with availability varying by tool and audience.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
UC Davis guidance tells students to confirm with instructors before using AI in coursework and not to use AI to complete assignments unless explicitly permitted.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
UC Davis guidance says users should not enter sensitive UC Davis data, including student, personnel, patient, confidential research, or financial account information, into AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
procurement
UC Davis guidance says AI tools used for Administration and Services responsibilities require committee review and approval before campus or health departments proceed with procurement.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
UC Davis guidance tells UC Davis and UC Davis Health community members to use UC Davis-approved AI platforms, or UC Davis-developed tools, for university work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
8 source attributions
Acceptable Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Academic Coursework Policy
official_policy_page Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 1:00 PM
AI Guidance
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 12:47 PM
AI Tools
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 12:50 PM
Generative AI and Teaching
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 12:55 PM
Guidelines for Using Generative Artificial Intelligence
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 23, 2026, 6:20 PM
Guidelines for Using Generative Artificial Intelligence
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 12:58 PM
Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 12:51 PM
UC Davis Student Guide to Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI)
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 12:49 PM