政策记录与证据修订

发布六校 V6 更正，保留暂缓、历史、来源范围及未评分限制。

历史修订：以下记录数与主张集合以本版发布时为准，现行记录另见最新修订。

2026-10-22T13:36:57.019481Z · qs35-40-v6-r3-20261022

• The University of Melbourne · 35 条本版审核记录 · 查看政策页
  • 新增记录: 0; 更正记录: 0; 暂缓／移出当前结论: 0

查看上一版 V6 发布记录

记录修订、适用范围与原文

原文与人员、课程、学部范围保留。网站修订时间不是大学政策生效时间。

以下记录仅反映此历史版本，不代表当前政策记录或当前审核结论。

35bff81a521091832cdf880d1c15ac139851e635c2ca293b41ef7078e408838a

{
  "addedClaimIds": [],
  "updatedClaimIds": [],
  "heldClaimIds": []
}

• claim-university-of-melbourne-5 — At the University of Melbourne, using GenAI tools on an assessment task that does not permit them, or using them in preparation without acknowledgement, constitutes academic misconduct under cl. 4.13 of the Student Academic Integrity Policy (MPF1310).
• claim-university-of-melbourne-10 — A high AI score in Turnitin's writing detection report is not proof of misconduct and does not on its own constitute grounds for making an allegation of academic misconduct.
• cl-the-university-of-melbourne-institutional-ai-service-147 — AILA is listed for The University of Melbourne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: self_hosted_system.
• cl-the-university-of-melbourne-institutional-ai-service-148 — SparkAI is listed for The University of Melbourne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: self_hosted_system.
• cl-the-university-of-melbourne-turnitin-ai-detection-149 — Turnitin AI writing detection is listed for The University of Melbourne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally_licensed_or_procured.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-1 — Before using GenAI for assessment-related work, University of Melbourne students must check that their Subject Coordinator has authorised its use.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-11 — Because third-party external platforms such as ChatGPT use prompts and inputs to further train their models, University of Melbourne staff must not enter assessments, teaching materials, or sensitive IP into third-party platforms, reserving such testing for SparkAI or sanctioned platforms.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-12 — If students use an AI tool such as ChatGPT to generate output that is paraphrased or directly quoted in assessable writing, it must be cited and referenced as a source in the reference list.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-15 — Generative AI tools can only be used in research outputs if material generated or substantially altered is acknowledged according to University policy and the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-16 — Researchers are advised not to share confidential information or innovation details in generative AI prompts, as that may cause IP to no longer be owned by the researcher or University.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-2 — University of Melbourne students must protect personal information and not upload full names, dates of birth, addresses, or other confidential, sensitive or private information to GenAI tools.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-3 — When uploading material to an AI tool, University of Melbourne students must ensure they do not violate creator copyright without permission.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-6 — Each University of Melbourne subject coordinator is responsible for setting out the bounds of appropriate GenAI use within their subject and having conversations with students for clarity.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-7 — Assessments and teaching materials constitute University IP and must never be tested on third-party external platforms like ChatGPT; testing or auditing must be done only within SparkAI or sanctioned platforms.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-9 — At the University of Melbourne, use of GenAI tools for marking or grading should never be a substitute for staff exercising their own evaluative judgement.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-8 — University of Melbourne staff may use GenAI tools to help prepare teaching materials provided care is exercised for proper use of University IP and ethical AI use.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-13 — University of Melbourne staff should consider and provide advice on the limits of acceptable use of AI-powered translation and editing tools (e.g. Grammarly, Google Translate) in their subjects, as student use can extend to the point where students are no longer expressing their own ideas.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-17 — In its 2023 submission, the University encouraged optional government sector guidance and communities of practice to share best practice in GenAI education.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-18 — The Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning (BEL+T) provides discipline-specific guidance offering educators key concepts and definitions for generative AI in built environments.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-4 — At the University of Melbourne, students are expected to produce their own perspective, experience, and knowledge in assessable work rather than rely on AI output alone.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-14 — Specific guidance for University of Melbourne researchers regarding acknowledging digital assistance tools in research outputs is available via the Research Ethics and Integrity website.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-citation-vs-declaration — University of Melbourne guidance mandates that citing AI outputs in the reference list does not replace an acknowledgement declaration: students who cite or paraphrase AI outputs must still provide a declaration detailing how AI tools were used across the assessment process.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-student-exam-rules — In University of Melbourne examinations, students must verify whether GenAI use is authorised for the specific exam, and if permitted, ensure that only approved tools and specified uses are employed in alignment with University policy.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-exam-rules — Under University guidelines on assuring learning in the age of GenAI, in most cases subjects are designed so that secure assessment types account for at least 50% of total marks, with phased implementation (2026–2028) and programmatic exceptions.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-technology-breach — The University of Melbourne academic misconduct framework explicitly categorizes unauthorized or undisclosed use of technology (including GenAI) as a breach type under academic integrity procedures.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-misconduct-tiers — Poor academic practice refers to minor and unintentional departures managed educatively by Subject Coordinators, and is explicitly distinct from academic misconduct.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-turnitin-investigation-rights — Turnitin AI detection results serve only as a prompt for further investigation; if suspected, students may be invited to explain their work and provide drafts or notes in an exploratory discussion.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-appeals-window — Under University of Melbourne student appeals procedures, appeals against academic misconduct decisions must be submitted via the online form within 20 University business days from the original decision date.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-copilot-chat — University of Melbourne students have access to M365 Copilot Chat with their student account, supporting study with private OneDrive data protection; assessment use must follow subject rules and be properly acknowledged.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-research-integrity-mpf1318 — Under section 5.11 of the Responsible Conduct of Research Policy (MPF1318) and University guidance, research personnel must document digital assistance tool use, disclose DAT use to collaborators and in outputs (including theses), and obtain all required privacy, security, and ethics approvals.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-graduate-thesis-editing — For graduate researchers and research theses, digital assistance and GenAI use is strictly limited to minor editorial support (language, clarity, spelling, grammar) under the Australian Standards for Editing Practice; substantial redrafting is prohibited and supervisor AI review requires explicit written permission.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-aila-lms-privacy — Student interactions with LMS-embedded tools such as AILA are governed by the University LMS privacy collection notice: interaction metadata, assessment content, and system records are retained in the LMS and may be reviewed to verify authorship or investigate suspected policy breaches, accessible to authorized decision-makers.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-cshe-assessment-enhancement — The Melbourne CSHE provides a range of pedagogical strategies for using GenAI tools to enhance assessment tasks.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-secure-vs-open-assessment — Assuring student learning requires careful use of secure assessment types at key points where student authorship can be verified, contrasted with open assessments where rules may be circumvented.
• claim-university-of-melbourne-ten-ai-principles — The University of Melbourne AI Principles commit to building awareness among students and staff of their responsibilities around AI tools in work preparation and managing integrity-related risks.