版本差异
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
针对...的统一追踪器差异 public-release-20260523-001。未发布完整的源页面文本；仅显示简短的原始语言证据片段以供引用参考。
统一差异
基于公开版本快照生成的版本间跟踪器变更。
Worcester Polytechnic Institute public-release-20260523-001 差异
初始跟踪发布。
+15-0
11 # Worcester Polytechnic Institute AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+academic_integrity: WPI's academic-integrity page defines cheating to include using unauthorized study aids, materials, information, or assistance in academic activity or assessment, and defines plagiarism to include using another's words, ideas, assertions, data, creative works, or graphics without proper attribution.
5+Evidence (en, 0e7022025c47): Cheating: Attempting to use or intentionally using unauthorized study aids, materials, information, or assistance in any academic activity or assessment. ... Plagiarism: Using words, ideas, assertions, data, creative works, or graphics of another without proper attribution in any academic activity.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-21T15:24:40.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+teaching: WPI Library guidance says users should be transparent about AI-tool use and cite AI tools when they use them to gather information, write or edit text, generate media, synthesize ideas, or clean or manipulate data.
10+Evidence (en, d29c2b88b0a3): In general, you should always be transparent about your use of AI tools. Since AI tools cannot be considered an author ... they are generally considered a collaborator. Cite AI tools when they are used to: Gather information; Write text or generate media; Edit text; Synthesize ideas or find connections; "Clean" or manipulate data.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-21T15:24:10.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+ai_tool_treatment: WPI Library guidance states that WPI professors have broad discretion over whether, how, and when students may use ChatGPT or other generative-AI content in assignments and projects, and students should check with their professor for expectations.
15+Evidence (en, 2dd8b2505b64): At WPI professors have broad discretion and many valid perspectives on whether, how, and when students can use ChatGPT or other content produced by generative artificial intelligence in assignments and projects.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-21T15:23:30.000Z
817 ## Source attribution added
918 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
19+Source https://libguides.wpi.edu/ai/citing snapshot d29c2b88b0a39e2b50f223c87fdb598181b05b6dc8a0db7ccfb7f712b65f89df
20+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-21T15:24:10.000Z
1021 ## Source attribution added
1122 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
23+Source https://libguides.wpi.edu/ai/home snapshot 2dd8b2505b64ddf87a0126b2a66509baf4d1c722ca79086ef48f535d2f9e167e
24+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-21T15:23:30.000Z
1225 ## Source attribution added
1326 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
27+Source https://www.wpi.edu/about/policies/academic-integrity/dishonesty snapshot 0e7022025c473a41565c3bc6d9121a4b83640e112983286b203593999acfe076
28+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-21T15:24:40.000Z
如何阅读此差异
追踪器发布元数据，而非大学发布时间点的直接证明。
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更意味着同一 URL 产生了不同的哈希值；这可能是政策文本、布局、导航或元数据的变化。
边界
仅限追踪器元数据
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.