版本差异
University of Glasgow

针对...的统一追踪器差异 public-release-20260523-001。未发布完整的源页面文本；仅显示简短的原始语言证据片段以供引用参考。
审核: 智能体已审核版本public-release-20260523-001政策文本0新提取的12来源哈希值0源文本0
11 # University of Glasgow AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: University of Glasgow student guidance says the university does not seek to prohibit student AI-tool use generally and instead supports effective, ethical, critical, and transparent use.
5+Evidence (en, fbe160c7e8c4): Consequently, rather than seek to prohibit your use of these tools, we want to support you in learning how to use them effectively, ethically, critically, and transparently.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+teaching: University of Glasgow assessment-design guidance says GenAI use in assessment should not always be treated as plagiarism and encourages assessment design that lets students demonstrate skills beyond knowledge recall.
10+Evidence (en, 4f7cc9de635d): It is important to recognise that the use of GenAI in assessment should not, in all cases, be treated as plagiarism. Rather we should carefully consider how we design assessment to ensure that students can demonstrate skills beyond purely knowledge recall.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+teaching: University of Glasgow's GenAI assessment guidance is intended to explain university policy on GenAI tools in assessment practice and outlines three assessment-use scenarios.
15+Evidence (en, bf70fcc33ddc): The purpose of this guidance is to help you understand the University's policy on the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools in relation to assessment practice. It outlines three scenarios that detail how GenAI can be used in assessment.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+security_review: University of Glasgow IT guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat as the only AI service approved for use with University data and says users must be logged in with UofG credentials for approved use.
20+Evidence (en, 9cb739458f4c): Microsoft Copilot Chat is a Generative AI tool that uses the same large language models as Open AI's ChatGPT, but with added security. It is the only AI service approved for use with University data.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+privacy: University of Glasgow's PGR GenAI checklist advises PGR students to avoid uploading confidential or sensitive information, including research data and peer review content, to AI tools.
25+Evidence (en, 5819d22ad207): Avoid uploading confidential or sensitive information to an AI tool (this includes research data and peer review content).
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
1227 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1328 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
29+academic_integrity: Regulation 32 says use of websites or generative AI software that generates answers or references is prohibited, while some Schools may allow AI tools for specific purposes and any AI use must be referenced.
30+Evidence (en, b7688dc58990): Using any website or generative artificial intelligence (AI) software that generates answers or references is prohibited. In some Schools, AI tools may be used in some circumstances and for specific purposes, but students must not misuse AI tools outwith specific assessment instructions. Any use of AI must be referenced in the work for transparency.
31+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
1432 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1533 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
34+academic_integrity: Regulation 32 states that assessed student work should not contain content produced by another person, website, software, or AI tool except where AI use is explicitly permitted.
35+Evidence (en, b7688dc58990): All work submitted by students for assessment is accepted on the understanding that it is the student's own effort. This means students' work should not contain content that has been produced by another person, website, software or Artificial intelligence (AI) tool (except where AI use is explicitly permitted).
36+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
1637 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1738 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
39+research: University of Glasgow researcher guidance states that any use of generative AI tools by staff, students, and researchers must be accompanied by critical analysis and oversight by the user.
40+Evidence (en, deb3bed4773d): There is therefore one overriding principle, which applies to all staff, students, and researchers at the University: any use of generative AI tools must be accompanied by critical analysis and oversight on the part of the user.
41+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
1842 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1943 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
44+research: University of Glasgow researcher guidance says AI tools used as part of research design, methods, disciplinary toolkit, or research subject should be covered by relevant ethical approval and data protection processes.
45+Evidence (en, deb3bed4773d): Where AI tools form part of your research design or methods, the tool kit within your discipline, or are a subject of your research, your use of them as a researcher should be covered by relevant ethical approval and data protection processes.
46+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
2047 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2148 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
49+teaching: University of Glasgow staff guidance says Schools are advised by central policy to decide locally whether AI is allowed not at all, under specified circumstances, or without restriction with acknowledgement.
50+Evidence (en, c5e3f1330f9e): Schools are advised by central UofG policy to first decide locally on which of 3 levels of AI are allowable in their courses: not at all; under certain circumstances as outlined by the School; or without restriction (though it must always be acknowledged where used).
51+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
2252 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2353 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
54+privacy: University of Glasgow IT guidance says confidential or sensitive information belonging to the university or a third party should not be put into AI tools.
55+Evidence (en, 9cb739458f4c): Confidential or sensitive information (including, for example, IP) belonging to the University or any third party should not be put into AI tools.
56+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
2457 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2558 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
59+academic_integrity: University of Glasgow student guidance says using AI or other computational aids in university work without acknowledging the input counts as academic misconduct.
60+Evidence (en, fbe160c7e8c4): It is important to note that using any form of AI or other computational aids in your university coursework, study, exams, or research without acknowledging that input counts as academic misconduct.
61+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
2662 ## Source attribution added
2763 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
64+Source https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/apg/policies/uniregs/regulations2025-26/feesandgeneral/studentsupportandconductmatters/reg32/ snapshot b7688dc589908531dbc4834858d94c486a298d26459ef94d0dbcf140f8bcd977
65+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
2866 ## Source attribution added
2967 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
68+Source https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/it/365/copilot/guidance/ snapshot 9cb739458f4ca0b919f497cd58f760f7028cc334b3dab326df960086fc43789c
69+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
3070 ## Source attribution added
3171 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
72+Source https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/learningandteaching/af-aiguidance/ snapshot bf70fcc33ddcf66d601c3c6816bd9c4c69c4b0b68dab3876b965ef22ba425627
73+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
3274 ## Source attribution added
3375 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
76+Source https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/learningandteaching/af-aiguidance/howcaniadaptassessmenttodealwithgenai/ snapshot 4f7cc9de635d75b7f50fcb54e91d39692f54bbf1501e23c5dd4463a112abb5b6
77+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
3478 ## Source attribution added
3579 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
80+Source https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/sld/ai/staff/ snapshot c5e3f1330f9e51f81d5d8230316172b173c211a89d2c245215c53cbcdadc3b45
81+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
3682 ## Source attribution added
3783 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
84+Source https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/sld/ai/students/ snapshot fbe160c7e8c4720f978e5751563a0bf76f60aff1317cca27621a403cb0ea1c3b
85+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
3886 ## Source attribution added
3987 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
88+Source https://www.gla.ac.uk/research/ourresearchenvironment/prs/pgrpolicystrategyqualityassurance/genaiforpgrschecklist/ snapshot 5819d22ad20725ecca4c32b513a6281e9080fe10417db5481cf5ed2007b557c6
89+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
4090 ## Source attribution added
4191 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
92+Source https://www.gla.ac.uk/research/strategy/ourpolicies/ai-for-researchers/ snapshot deb3bed4773dd4c37f31ab98db96e3303a26a12077e5418477dcb33fc53129ac
93+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:25.000Z
如何阅读此差异

追踪器发布元数据，而非大学发布时间点的直接证明。
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更意味着同一 URL 产生了不同的哈希值；这可能是政策文本、布局、导航或元数据的变化。
边界

仅限追踪器元数据
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
University of Glasgow

统一差异

大学 of Glasgow public-release-20260523-001 差异

如何阅读此差异

边界
