版本差异
University of Bristol
针对...的统一追踪器差异 public-release-20260523-001。未发布完整的源页面文本；仅显示简短的原始语言证据片段以供引用参考。
统一差异
基于公开版本快照生成的版本间跟踪器变更。
大学 of Bristol public-release-20260523-001 差异
初始跟踪发布。
+20-0
11 # University of Bristol AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+teaching: University of Bristol has published official guidance on generative AI use in taught degree programmes, stating that generative AI should not replace activities that develop intellectual rigour, student agency, and students' capacity to work through complex problems themselves.
5+Evidence (en, 37b0e7d3dd50): This guidance sets out the University of Bristol's approach to using generative AI on taught degree programmes. The responsible use of generative AI is foundational to our educational vision to inspire students, and to equip well-rounded graduates with skills for the future. Generative AI should not replace activities that develop intellectual rigour, student agency, and students' capacity to work through complex problems themselves.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-12T05:50:00Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+academic_integrity: University of Bristol considers the use of AI or translation tools to be cheating if used for more than generating the occasional short phrase within a sentence or checking basic grammar and spelling, unless assessment instructions allow more comprehensive use.
10+Evidence (en, a6de8d5d6e7d): We consider the use of AI or translation tools to be cheating if used for more than: generating the occasional short phrase within a sentence, checking basic grammar and spelling. Some assessments may allow more comprehensive use of these tools, but this will be detailed in your assessment instructions.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-12T05:50:00Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+teaching: University of Bristol uses a four-category system for AI use in assessments: Category 1 (prohibited - no AI use), Category 2 (minimal - spelling/grammar only, default), Category 3 (selective - certain tasks as specified), and Category 4 (integral - AI required for assessment).
15+Evidence (en, 076c72c33eff): Category 1: prohibited (not allowed) - You cannot use AI tools at all, including spelling and grammar checkers. Category 2: minimal (a little) - You can use AI tools for spelling and grammar check. You can use it for rewording occasional phrases, but not sentences, large parts of text or paragraphs. Category 3: selective (certain tasks) - AI tools can be used in certain ways. Your lecturer will tell you what you can use it for. Category 4: integral (important) - AI tools are needed for the assessment.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-12T05:50:00Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+research: PGR students at University of Bristol are not permitted to use generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to write any text used in their thesis or APM reports, as research degree students must demonstrate ability to write about research in their own words.
20+Evidence (en, e7650f617311): To be awarded a research degree, you must meet several key standards in your research training. One of these is the ability to write about your research in your own words. This critical research skill is tested through your thesis and through your annual progress monitoring (APM) reports. For this reason, you are not permitted to use generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT, to write any text that is used in your thesis or in your APM reports.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-12T05:50:00Z
1022 ## Source attribution added
1123 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
24+Source https://www.bristol.ac.uk/academic-quality/pg/ai-tools-and-thesis-writing/ snapshot e7650f617311bc07db8be26780653990911db1d83b4a12b497d5b00b099443b0
25+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-12T05:50:00Z
1226 ## Source attribution added
1327 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
28+Source https://www.bristol.ac.uk/bilt/sharing-practice/guides/guidance-on-ai/ snapshot 37b0e7d3dd50bec5d10915bb613220c112704886141cd9d248a82776642385ed
29+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-12T05:50:00Z
1430 ## Source attribution added
1531 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
32+Source https://www.bristol.ac.uk/students/support/academic-advice/academic-integrity/ snapshot a6de8d5d6e7d833e65504e8ba3cbd5c547e50d755e583bf416228eaa39c3e14a
33+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-12T05:50:00Z
1634 ## Source attribution added
1735 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
36+Source https://www.bristol.ac.uk/students/support/academic-advice/using-artificial-intelligence/ snapshot 076c72c33eff9a4492777ac3731ec4ba5255f18c0449757f4d3f9f48e9084017
37+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-12T05:50:00Z
如何阅读此差异
追踪器发布元数据，而非大学发布时间点的直接证明。
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更意味着同一 URL 产生了不同的哈希值；这可能是政策文本、布局、导航或元数据的变化。
边界
仅限追踪器元数据
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.